Understanding PEComa in the Liver: A Personal Account
Greetings, everyone. I wanted to share an update regarding my 79-year-old aunt, who was diagnosed with a benign PEComa in her liver toward the end of last year. Given its significant size and proximity to crucial blood vessels, her medical team has decided against surgical removal, opting instead to monitor the condition with examinations every six months. Today, her doctor reached out to inform me that he had reviewed her latest scan. The results indicated that while the PEComa remains stable in size, it has shown a slight increase. Despite this minor growth, the physician expressed that it is still a concern because of the tumor's substantial location within the liver. For now, the only option is continued observation. I find myself feeling quite helpless and uncertain about the situation. Are there any alternatives to just regular checkups? Is it feasible for me to consider donating part of my liver to her? I apologize for my need for clarity; I’m just searching for any possible avenues or support.
Answers (1)
4/4/2025, 6:20:36 PM
OpenHealth AI
It’s understandable to feel concerned about your aunt's diagnosis and the ongoing surveillance of her PEComa. You've raised important questions regarding potential next steps and your desire to support her. Here’s a structured response to address your concerns:
Main Points:
- Monitoring is currently the best approach due to the PEComa's location and stability.
- There are no standard treatment options beyond observation for benign PEComas like your aunt's in the liver.
- Living liver donation is a significant procedure with many considerations, including evaluation for eligibility.
Explanation:
PEComas (Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms) are rare tumors that can occur in various body parts, including the liver. Although they can grow, in many cases, they remain benign and do not require active treatment unless they advance in size or cause symptoms. The decision to monitor rather than operate, especially given your aunt’s age and the tumor's location, reflects a careful assessment of risks and benefits.
While you seek potential alternatives to regular checkups, it's essential to note that no specific treatments, like chemotherapy or targeted therapies, are currently deemed effective for benign PEComas. The current approach of close observation every six months allows her medical team to track any changes without unnecessary risks associated with surgery.
Next Steps:
- Continue Observation: Trust the process of regular monitoring since it's the primary recommendation. Ensure her medical team keeps you informed of any changes in a timely manner.
- Discuss Options: Encourage open discussions with her medical team about any new findings and the rationale behind continued observation. Ask if there are any innovative treatments or clinical trials applicable in her case.
- Liver Donation Consideration: Research if living liver donation is a feasible option. The first step would be to discuss it with her doctors, who can evaluate her current health status and risk factors. The evaluation process is thorough and includes numerous tests to ensure both donor and recipient are suitable candidates.
- Emotional Support: Consider seeking support for yourself and your family during this time through counseling services or support groups. Sharing feelings and getting advice from others in similar situations can be helpful.
Your concern for your aunt’s well-being shows you're a caring relative, and engaging with her healthcare team is crucial. You're taking important steps by seeking clarity and considering your options. If you need more information or support, feel free to reach out.
Related Questions
Semen Analysis Results: Assessing Low Motility and Vitality — Are They Temporary due to Stress?
Hello everyone, I’m a 36-year-old male and I recently received the results of my first semen analysis. I’m seeking to determine if the findings indicate a significant medical issue or if they are possibly linked to situational factors. Here’s some context that could be relevant: - I experienced considerable stress during the week the test was conducted. - My sleep quality was particularly poor the night before the test. - Since the collection took place at a clinic, I felt high levels of anxiety and minimal arousal. - Additionally, the sensation during ejaculation seemed weaker than what I normally experience. Here are the key results from the analysis: - Volume: 2.3 ml - Concentration: 30.9 million/ml - Total sperm count: approximately 71 million - Morphology: 9% (WHO reference is ≥4%) - Progressive motility: 18% (considered low) - Total motility: 36.7% (on the lower side of normal) - Vitality: 39% (low range) - No infections detected, no agglutination, and low white blood cell count The lab remarked on the presence of asthenozoospermia and necrozoospermia, indicating issues with motility and vitality. I also have some pertinent medical background: - I underwent orchidopexy as a child, resulting in one testicle being somewhat smaller while the other appears normal. - A recent urine analysis yielded normal results. - I am experiencing no pain and have shown no indications of infection. Here are my inquiries: - Is it plausible that acute stress, lack of sleep, and anxiety during the clinic visit could lead to significant reductions in motility and vitality in just one analysis? - Considering the normal sperm count and morphology, does this situation imply that the issues might be more functional or temporary rather than permanent? - Should repeating the semen analysis under more favorable conditions be the next logical step?
Is it Safe to Apply a Separated Ointment?
I have a one-month-old daughter who has been dealing with a yeast infection, for which her pediatrician recommended Miconazole cream. After finishing the first tube, I noticed some persistent red spots, prompting the doctor to prescribe another tube. However, I've noticed something concerning with this second tube; it appears to have separated. On squeezing the tube, a white cream and a clear, oily liquid resembling olive oil emerge. Should I attempt to mix the contents of the tube, or is this separation an indication of a problem? I’m unsure whether it is safe to apply this ointment. Unfortunately, my pediatrician’s office is closed for the weekend, and I've already observed that my daughter's rash is beginning to reappear after just half a day without the ointment.
Concerns Regarding My Father's Prostate MRI Results
Greetings, I'm reaching out because my father, who is 71 years old, recently underwent an ultrasound that revealed a nodule. His physician suggested an MRI for further examination, assuring us that there was no immediate cause for alarm. However, the findings indicated a PI-RADS score of 4, with a nodule measuring about 0.5 by 0.6 cm. This nodule, located in the transition zone, is non-encapsulated and poorly defined, though there are no indications of it extending beyond the prostate. His PSA level is 0.96 ng/mL and the PSA density is measured at 0.03, with the prostate’s total volume being 34cc. I find myself anxious over the PI-RADS 4 classification, as it suggests a relatively high risk for cancer, even though the PSA levels appear to be more reassuring. Thankfully, my father is asymptomatic and appears to be in good health. A follow-up appointment has already been arranged, but I’m curious—should I be concerned about any urgent implications or potential serious outcomes from this situation?
Concern Over Cystic Lesions: Seeking Clarification
Greetings, I’m a 23-year-old female recently diagnosed with adenomyosis and polycystic ovarian syndrome following an MRI examination. While I have a scheduled consultation with my doctor in a week, I find myself anxious for clarity on certain findings from the MRI report, which I am sharing below. The report indicates the presence of: - A thicc-walled cystic lesion exhibiting peripheral wall enhancement, approximately 2 by 1.6 cm in size, located in the right ovary, with noted thin internal septation and irregularities in the internal mucosal structure. - A smaller cyst, measuring about 2 cm in diameter, also in the right ovary, displaying thin internal septation. My primary concern regards the thick-walled cystic lesion: could it be benign, or should I be alarmed, indicating a need for further evaluation by my gynecologist? I understand that smaller cysts are generally not a cause for concern, but I wonder if this applies only to those that are uniformly shaped and possess thinner walls. The MRI was performed to evaluate potential endometriosis. A previous transvaginal ultrasound ruled out deep infiltrating endometriosis, prompting the MRI to ensure no abnormalities were overlooked, especially given that my calprotectin level was significantly elevated at over 1000, despite a colonoscopy revealing no signs of inflammation, along with reports of resistance detected externally from the colon suggesting the possibility of endometriosis. While I await my appointment, I would greatly appreciate any insights into these findings. Moreover, the MRI results also highlighted mild pelvic congestion and a small amount of free fluid in the pouch of Douglas (POD). --- Background Health Issues: I experience postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTs) and chronic hypotension.
Can Blood Test Results Be Inaccurate?
Background: 23, Assigned Female at Birth (AFAB) I undergo testosterone cypionate injections on a weekly basis. As a trans man, I have been receiving testosterone therapy for four years. Recently, I switched to a new hormone specialist and underwent blood testing with him. Historically, my testosterone levels have typically fluctuated between 400 to 600 ng/dL. However, the results from my recent test showed a concerning level of only 67 ng/dL. I have been diligent about my injections, although I did miss one month a few months back due to mental health challenges. Is it possible for testosterone levels to fall so drastically after just a month without a shot? I had the test done six days following my latest injection. I'm left wondering if this level drop is plausible or if it could indicate a mistake in the lab results.