What Could This Bump Be?
I'm a 19-year-old male who recently had a wart excised from the bottom of my foot. Following the removal, it has developed a hard, dry surface coupled with a tough yellow outer layer, and it's quite painful when I apply pressure to it. Additionally, it is raised. What could this be, and what treatment options do you recommend? Appreciate your help!
Answers (1)
2/6/2026, 11:10:31 PM
OpenHealth AI
It sounds like you're dealing with a potentially normal part of the healing process after your wart excision, but the description of a hard, painful bump with a tough yellow layer is important to address. This could suggest a few possibilities, such as a scar tissue formation, a recurring wart, or possibly a callus.
Explanation: After wart excision, the body may form scar tissue or a callus as part of the healing process, which can feel hard and painful due to pressure. If it’s raised and painful, it may also indicate that the tissue is still healing or that there may be some residual wart tissue. It's good that you're observing these changes, as they could guide the next steps in care.
Next Steps:
-
Avoid Pressure: Try to minimize pressure on the area, especially when walking. You might consider wearing cushioned footwear or using padding to alleviate pressure in that spot.
-
Moisturize: Gently apply a moisturizer or a mild ointment (like aloe vera or vitamin E) to the area, which may help soften the tough skin over time.
-
Observe: Keep an eye on any changes in size, color, or pain level. If the pain worsens or the bump increases in size, it would be a sign to reassess the situation.
-
Consider OTC Treatments: If it appears to be a recurrence of a wart, over-the-counter treatments (like salicylic acid) could be effective, but use them cautiously and only if you're certain it's specifically a wart.
-
Seek Further Care if Needed: If the bump does not improve in a couple of weeks, or if it becomes increasingly painful or shows signs of infection (like drainage or increased redness), it's a good idea to consult with a healthcare professional for more tailored treatment advice.
Remember, healing can take time, and monitoring the area with simple care is often effective. If you have further concerns or questions as you proceed, feel free to ask!
Related Questions
Inquiry About Childhood Chiropractic Experience
Hello Reddit! I’m reaching out to seek insights regarding an experience from my adolescent years, roughly between the ages of 12 and 14. I’m currently 25 years old (female). To give you a bit of context, I encountered a troubling incident while bending down to access my locker; suddenly, my neck locked in a position to the side, rendering it completely immobile. The pain was unbearable. In response, my father thought it best to take me to a chiropractor, which seemed to provide some relief, yet I continued to endure significant pain and noticed an unusual odor that lingered for nearly a week. Unfortunately, this episode recurred a few months later, and I underwent the same routine; once again, I experienced that odd smell and extreme discomfort. Since those two occurrences, I have faced similar issues on only a couple of occasions, during which I opted for hospital care instead of chiropractic treatment. The medical professionals provided muscle relaxants, which effectively alleviated my pain without any bizarre lingering odor. Since those formative experiences, I have been left with a constant discomfort in my right shoulder, which feels strained frequently, and I find that my head tends to tilt towards one side. What could have caused this neck locking issue during my youth, and could my decision to visit a chiropractor instead of a physician have led to ongoing complications? I'm eager to understand what happened during those situations!
Frustration Over Medical Error: My Child's X-Rays Were of the Wrong Foot
[Patient: A healthy 2.5-year-old boy, average height and weight] I could really use some support right now. A couple of days ago, my toddler injured his foot while playing on a slide at the park. Since then, he hasn't been able to walk without pain or put weight on that foot, only managing to take a few steps at best. We visited his pediatrician, who performed an examination and concluded that the issue was with his left foot. She requested x-rays for that specific foot. After the x-rays were taken, the results indicated no fractures, merely suggesting a soft tissue injury that would require rest. However, after watching him struggle to move today, I've realized that he's actually favoring his left foot, while it’s his right foot that he's avoiding! They took x-rays of the wrong foot! 🤦♀️ As a parent, I feel absolutely devastated that this error occurred. I find myself overwhelmed with guilt for putting him through unnecessary radiation exposure. They captured around eight pictures of a foot that isn’t injured at all. The financial aspect—having spent $600 on those x-rays—feels secondary to the worry about the radiation and the continued uncertainty regarding whether there’s an actual injury. I'm feeling extremely upset and incompetent as a mother. Maybe someone could help me understand the radiation risk better? I’m really struggling with this situation.
Should I Be Worried? Firm Lump on Thigh with Expanding Swelling
I’m seeking guidance regarding a concerning issue. A solid lump emerged on my inner thigh just two days ago and has enlarged to about a centimeter in size within the day. It seems as if there are two adjacent abscesses. While it isn’t painful, I noticed some swelling yesterday, which has since increased. I am a 25-year-old trans man, standing at 5'10" and weighing around 170 lbs. I have a history of skin infections, including multiple occurrences of cellulitis and shingles that I experienced when I was 11. Additionally, I sometimes get pimples on my inner thighs. Currently, I receive 0.5mL testosterone injections weekly and take 200mg of sertraline daily. I have also recently begun iron supplements.
Questions About My Child’s Birth Documentation
Child's Age: 20 months Gender: Male Medical Diagnosis: Benign neutropenia and slightly increased calcium levels (Conditions that we are currently observing with specialists, all of which show no cause for alarm.) While reviewing my son’s birth documentation, I was surprised to come across a note stating "Resuscitated at birth: ..." followed by details I had not anticipated. I was completely unaware that my child had undergone resuscitation. Should this raise any red flags for me? Is it a significant issue that he required supplemental oxygen? I don't recall any unusual events during his delivery. It’s worth noting that we opted for a Cesarean section due to concerning fetal heart tones. Interestingly, I also examined my daughter’s records from a different facility, which contained similar wording, but it did not specify the use of oxygen. Details from the Birth: - Resuscitation Summary: Utilization of oxygen, suctioning, and tactile stimulation. - Additional notes include: baby was born, emitted a spontaneous cry, umbilical cord was cut, taken to a warmer, warmed up, dried off, suctioned, and maintained a strong cry and good muscle tone. A neonatal nurse practitioner administered blow-by oxygen to the infant for a brief period to aid with colorization at five minutes post-birth. Onset of Natural Breathing: Immediate Date and Time of Birth: 03/06/2024 Delivery Attending: Delivery Method: Primary Cesarean Section Apgar Score at 1 minute: 8 Apgar Score at 5 minutes: 9 Infant's Birth Weight: 4.08 kg Infant's Birth Length: 53.5 cm
Assistance Required for MRI Results Interpretation
Summary: The MRI indicates signs of degeneration at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. However, there is no notable narrowing in the central canal or foramina. Detailed Findings: Clinical Context: The patient presents with saddle anesthesia symptoms. Comparison: No prior imaging available for contrast. Methodology: Multiple views and sequences of the lumbar region were captured without the use of contrast material. Observations: For this assessment, the analysis will involve five lumbar vertebrae. The lowest intervertebral disc is identified as L5-S1. Vertebra heights are normal, with no alarming bone lesions present. The visible areas of the distal spinal cord appear normal, and the conus medullaris reaches the L1 vertebra without evidence of spondylolisthesis. The surrounding abdominal soft tissues show no signs of acute issues. Segment-Specific Insights: - T12-L1: No significant findings. - L1-L2: No significant findings. - L2-L3: No significant findings. - L3-L4: No significant findings. - L4-L5: There is evidence of disc dehydration along with a mild broad-based disc osteophyte formation, yet no focal herniation. Mild bilateral facet joint degeneration is evident, and there is a slight narrowing of the neural foramina, but central canal narrowing is not significant. - L5-S1: Displays a mild disc osteophyte complex and bilateral facet arthropathy, with minimal central canal narrowing. The neural foramina remain open and unobstructed.