Exploring Insights on a 62-Year-Old with Thyroid Nodules
I am reaching out to gather some perspectives regarding my father, a 62-year-old man of Hispanic descent, who has diabetes and hypertension. Last August, he required urgent medical attention due to complications from tuberculosis and pneumonia. During this treatment, a CT scan was performed, which unexpectedly revealed an issue with his thyroid. Following this, an ultrasound was conducted, uncovering a total of 17 nodules. The majority were classified within the TR1-TR3 range; however, one particular nodule raised concerns: it measured 3.3 x 4.1 x 1.9 cm, was solid and iso-echoic in appearance, wider than it was tall, smooth, and contained macrocalcifications. This nodule was categorized as TR4, leading to a recommendation for a fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). It wasn't until last week that we were able to schedule a consultation with an endocrinologist. During this appointment, it was suggested that he undergo another ultrasound along with lab tests. The results of the TSH and FT4 tests were within the normal range. The latest ultrasound indicated that while many of the nodules remained classified as TR1-3, the one located in the isthmus was notably larger, now presented as a heterogeneous solid mass nearly replacing the isthmus, measuring 3.6 x 2.8 x 2.0 cm, with prominent coarse calcifications. The physician is advocating for a proactive approach, recommending a thyroidectomy. This came as quite a shock to us, and we are eager to understand whether other medical professionals would endorse a similar course of action or suggest an alternative approach.
Answers (1)
2/6/2026, 1:40:35 PM
OpenHealth AI
It's understandable that you're seeking clarity on your father's situation, especially after receiving such significant recommendations concerning his health. The key points to note are:
- Your father has multiple thyroid nodules, with one nodule—now enlarged and exhibiting concerning features—prompting the recommendation for surgery.
- The classification of nodules (TR1-TR3 being generally benign, TR4 indicating possible malignancy) plays a critical role in deciding further action.
- Given his medical history and current health status, a proactive approach is suggested.
Explanation
Thyroid nodules are very common, particularly as people age, and many are benign. However, nodules that grow larger or have concerning features can require more careful scrutiny, as they have the potential to be harmful. In your father's case, the nodule categorized as TR4 indicates there is a moderate risk of cancer, especially since it is now larger and has changed significantly since the last examination.
A thyroidectomy, or surgical removal of the thyroid, is often recommended in cases where there are concerns about cancer, especially when the nodule shows signs of significant growth and has abnormal characteristics.
Next Steps
- Seek a Second Opinion: Given the shock of the recommendation, consider consulting another endocrinologist or an oncologist specializing in thyroid conditions for further opinions on the necessity of surgery.
- Review Ultrasound Findings: Request a detailed explanation of the ultrasound results and ask about what specific characteristics led to the surgical suggestion.
- Consider Additional Testing: Discuss the possibility of repeating a fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) now that the nodule has changed to provide a clearer understanding of its nature.
- Monitor Symptoms: Keep track of any changes in your father's symptoms (e.g., difficulty swallowing, changes in voice, or rapid weight changes) while navigating this situation.
Navigating a recommendation for surgery can be daunting, and it’s essential to feel confident about the chosen approach. Take your time to gather all necessary information to help you and your father make informed decisions regarding his health.
Related Questions
Understanding Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly
My father, at the age of 78, generally enjoys good health, with his only prescription being for blood pressure management. On December 22, 2025, he underwent surgery to remove a Grade 2 meningioma. Remarkably, he discharged from the hospital less than a day later and initially felt fantastic. However, by December 30, he began experiencing severe headaches, slurred speech, and cognitive confusion, leading to a diagnosis of a 1 cm subdural hematoma. As of now, most of his symptoms have improved, though he still experiences occasional confusion and fatigue. He has been advised to limit his physical activities. Since the diagnosis, he has undergone CT scans biweekly, with the results showing no significant changes. The most recent CT scan impressions indicate that there is no notable difference in the approximately 1 cm thick subdural fluid accumulation in the frontoparietal region when compared to the MRI dated January 13, 2026. The examination noted mild compression of the brain's sulci and a slight midline shift, but overall, the brain appeared normal, and the ventricles were within normal size limits. Concerns linger regarding his potential for full recovery, as I am uncertain if this condition could be permanent. The neurosurgeon’s approach leaves much to be desired—when we seek clarification, he tends to brush us off without providing satisfactory answers. I am now contemplating the long-term care needs and what adjustments may be necessary for the future.
Understanding Phleboliths: What You Should Know
As a man in my late 30s, I’ve generally enjoyed good health without any significant concerns. However, following a recent CT scan, I was relieved to receive a report confirming that everything appeared normal. Out of sheer curiosity, I decided to obtain the images from the scan for a closer look. To my surprise, I spotted small white dots in the pelvic region, which I later discovered were identified as phleboliths. This raises a question in my mind: why weren't these mentioned in my report? Are they considered harmless? Currently, I’ve been experiencing a feeling of tightness and dull pressure around my navel. Medical professionals have suggested that I am exhibiting symptoms of abdominal muscle guarding, which I can recognize in myself. I'm left wondering if these phleboliths have any connection to my discomfort or if they are simply benign findings unrelated to my symptoms.
Concerns About Mislabeling Seizures and Its Impact on Future Care
Hello, I'm a 24-year-old female healthcare student weighing 70 kg and standing at 166 cm tall. **Summary:** After a serious situation involving an overdose of prescribed medications combined with alcohol, I faced various challenges regarding my treatment. During this incident, a paramedic accused me of faking symptoms, as evidenced by police bodycam footage and witness accounts. The ambulance documentation inaccurately described me as aggressive and claimed I declined an ECG—something I don’t recall, and a witness contends was never offered. Additionally, the ambulance team admitted they did not conduct any capacity or safeguarding assessments. At the hospital, I was first labeled as having a "nervous breakdown" and subsequently diagnosed with psychogenic seizures, with little reevaluation. It wasn’t until my third visit that a physician expressed doubt regarding my condition and referred me to a neurologist. My main concern is that these biased notes could hinder my future healthcare while I also strive to comprehend my experiences and why they have categorized them as psychological. I'm seeking guidance on whether my worries are justified and the best way to address my ongoing healthcare needs. **Background:** I am currently studying midwifery in England, without any prior criminal allegations, and I don't engage in recreational drug use. I consume alcohol only in social settings. At the time of the incident, I had been diagnosed with anxiety and depression. **Incident Details:** • The police were the first to arrive on the scene and acted professionally. • The ambulance team arrived soon after. • During this time, I was confused and upset, experiencing episodes resembling seizures. • An ambulance clinician accused me of dishonesty and malingering, supported by witnesses and police footage. • Following this accusation, my distress intensified, and my behavior escalated. • Feeling unsafe with the ambulance crew, a friend transported me to the emergency room instead. **My Concerns:** • The ambulance's report labeled me as aggressive and indicated I had repeatedly refused an ECG, which I do not remember, and my witness claims was never suggested. • The ambulance service later acknowledged that no formal assessments regarding my capacity or safeguarding were performed despite indications of an overdose or impaired consciousness. • I found myself returning to A&E multiple times due to ongoing symptoms. • My initial discharge was categorized as a “nervous breakdown,” lacking proper safety-netting, as far as I remember. • On my second visit, following a fall, I learned my seizures were classified as psychogenic, after a minimal evaluation. • During my third visit, at last, a doctor recognized the ambiguity in my diagnosis and referred me to a neurologist, providing me with a sense of reassurance. • Certain hospital records indicate instances of drowsiness and difficulty in history-taking, yet other entries claim I was avoiding questions or withholding information willingly. **Effects of the Experience:** This ordeal has left me traumatized and hesitant about seeking emergency medical help in the future. I'm concerned that the inaccuracies and stigmatizing language in my medical records may affect my treatment down the line, especially regarding my neurology appointment. It seems my case was downplayed due to the lack of significant injury, which I attribute to the constant support from my family and friends who continuously sought assistance on my behalf. **Evidence I Possess:** • Body-worn footage from the police • Statements from witnesses, including my mother and a friend • Comprehensive correspondence from my ambulance complaint • Complete records from the hospital SAR **My Questions:** 1. What are the standard protocols for capacity and safeguarding assessments in cases of overdose accompanied by seizure-like symptoms and altered awareness? 2. How should medical professionals assess seizure-like episodes resulting from an overdose before labeling them as psychogenic? 3. Is it typical for records to state "no confusion" while simultaneously documenting drowsiness and difficulties in obtaining patient history? 4. To what extent can the ambulance handover information shape the emergency department’s understanding of the situation? 5. What approaches should I take with the neurologist when my records contain conflicting statements?
Persistent Lump in Cheek: Should I Be Concerned?
Greetings! For context, I’m a 21-year-old female. Approximately a decade ago, I noticed a small bump developing on the inner part of my left cheek, just above the jawline. Initially, it was quite minor, firm, and I could slightly shift its position. It remains imperceptible both from the exterior and within my mouth. Medical professionals provided no definitive answers; although I was advised to have it examined and possibly removed, lengthy wait times in my country, often exceeding five years, deterred my parents from pursuing this option, especially since it hasn’t caused me any pain. Over the years, the lump has varied in size. At times it becomes very small, almost unnoticeable, while at other moments, it returns to its average size, comparable to a small coin. Given its long-term presence and lack of discomfort, I've never felt alarmed. However, recently it has enlarged to the dimensions of a larger coin — roughly equivalent to a 50 cent euro piece. While it isn't particularly painful, there is a degree of discomfort when I touch it. Should I consult a physician regarding this change? What could it potentially be? It somewhat resembles what I’ve read about swollen salivary glands, yet I thought these typically recede over time. The duration of its existence remains perplexing to me. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Understanding Elevated GGT and ALP Levels
Could high levels of GGT and occasionally elevated ALP be indicative of a specific health issue? My husband has consistently shown normal AST and ALT results. He ceased alcohol consumption five years ago after receiving a diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. Although he drank moderately, I wouldn't classify him as an alcoholic. Since he has maintained sobriety, following a high-protein, low-sodium diet, his GGT and ALP levels continue to be high. He has experienced episodes of ascites and elevated portal pressure on several occasions. Additionally, he struggles with fat digestion and suffers from chronic diarrhea almost every day. I've raised concerns about this ongoing diarrhea as well as the elevated GGT and ALP levels during visits to hepatologists, but my remarks tend to be disregarded. Should these symptoms warrant further investigation, or am I overstepping by bringing them up? It seems the specialists attribute his condition solely to past alcohol use, without exploring other potential causes. In the meantime, my husband is dealing with malnutrition and has lost significant weight and muscle mass.