Concerns Regarding the Timing of a Second Surgery
Two weeks ago, my 76-year-old father-in-law underwent Deep Brain Stimulation surgery. Unfortunately, he did not regain consciousness post-anesthesia, leading to the discovery of a slight brain bleed. Shortly thereafter, the medical team identified that he was experiencing seizures; thankfully, medication helped to alleviate this issue. Just five days ago, he underwent a tracheotomy. His recovery has been gradual but positive, and as of today, he managed to open his eyes for half an hour and demonstrate tracking behavior intermittently. He can nod in response to simple questions. We have a sense that he is aware, albeit his progress is quite slow. Tomorrow, the surgical team intends to implant a battery to potentially alleviate his tremors, believing this could assist in his recovery process. However, I noticed a discrepancy in the doctor’s approach; just yesterday, the physician mentioned in their notes that they should wait until my father-in-law is stronger before proceeding with this next step. Yet, today, they expedited the scheduling for the battery placement. They also plan to activate the device the day after its implantation, coinciding with a transfer to a long-term care facility. Does this timetable seem reasonable? My intuition tells me that my father-in-law requires more time to recover before undergoing another surgical procedure. Activating the battery just a day after installation feels hasty, especially when considering that healthier patients usually wait two to four weeks post-surgery without complications. When my husband spoke to the doctor today, the reason cited for the expedited battery activation was merely “scheduling.” Is this scenario indicative of a rushed decision?
Answers (1)
12/17/2025, 6:20:39 AM
OpenHealth AI
It sounds like you are understandably concerned about the timing of your father-in-law's upcoming surgery and the activation of the Deep Brain Stimulation device, given his recent complications and recovery trajectory. Let’s break this down.
Main Points
- Your father-in-law had a significant surgery followed by complications, including a brain bleed and seizures.
- He has shown some positive signs of awareness, but his recovery is still gradual.
- The timing of the next surgery, particularly so soon after the tracheotomy and the prior surgery, raises questions.
Explanation
The situation you’ve described highlights the complexity of post-surgical care, especially in older patients and those with neurological issues. While the surgical team may see the potential benefits of proceeding with the battery installation to help manage his symptoms, including tremors, it is crucial to ensure he is at optimal health to tolerate the additional surgery and the activation of the device.
Your intuition regarding his need for more recovery time is valid, given the typical recommendations for post-operative recovery. It's common practice to allow patients time to stabilize and regain strength before undergoing further interventions.
Next Steps
-
Discuss Your Concerns: If you have not already, consider approaching the surgical team again. Express your concerns about the timing, especially the expedited schedule and the hastiness of activating the battery. Ask for clarification about why they believe he is stable enough for this procedure now.
-
Request a Meeting with the Care Team: Coordinating a sit-down with the entire medical team (surgeons, neurologists, and critical care specialists) can provide a clearer picture of the decision-making process and set your mind at ease.
-
Consider a Second Opinion: If you still feel uncertain after discussing this with the team, it may be helpful to seek a second opinion from another neurologist or a specialist in neurorehabilitation.
-
Monitor Recovery Progress: Keep closely observing your father-in-law’s recovery. Document any changes in his responsiveness or symptoms, and share this information with the healthcare team to advocate for his well-being.
-
Stay Informed About Post-Operative Care: Educate yourself on the typical recovery timeline for patients undergoing similar procedures, which may help you frame your concerns more effectively when speaking with healthcare providers.
It's commendable that you are advocating for your father-in-law’s care. Trust your instincts, and ensure that every decision remains within the context of his specific needs and health status. Take all the time you need to understand and feel comfortable with the treatment plan moving forward.
Related Questions
Understanding Atrial Fibrillation and Thyroid Issues: Variability in Cardioversion Decisions
Hello everyone, I’m reaching out for guidance regarding my mother’s current health situation, and I’d greatly appreciate any shared experiences or thoughts. **My mother's background:** - **Age**: 55 years - **Weight**: Recently dropped to 116 kg from 118 kg in just two days, likely due to diuretics. - **Health history**: Previously an underactive thyroid, undiagnosed and untreated, now presenting as overactive. - **Medications**: Currently taking thyroid medication and a beta-blocker (Rapiblock). **Current health status:** My mother has been hospitalized since Tuesday, experiencing **atrial fibrillation with heart rates exceeding 200** beats per minute due to her thyroid's hyperactivity. - The plan for cardioversion was initially settled on Tuesday. However, the following day, the medical team advised postponing it until her thyroid levels could be stabilized, believing that her heart rate would return to normal once her thyroid condition was managed. - Her **obesity** precludes her from undergoing a transthoracic echocardiogram, and due to her thyroid concerns, she cannot handle contrast dye (this has been a consistent issue for over four years). Therefore, the only feasible option was a **transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)**, which has yet to be performed. - She has been prescribed various medications including beta-blockers and thyroid treatments in the past. - On Friday, a doctor proposed proceeding with cardioversion; however, the attending senior physician objected. - Today (Saturday), another clinician has expressed a desire to move forward with cardioversion, having initiated a new medication, as the senior physician is unavailable. - **Communication has been unclear**, as we were notified of developments by a nurse rather than the physician in charge, causing confusion and anxiety. - Currently, only a **chest X-ray** is scheduled, and the TEE remains unaddressed. **My inquiries are as follows:** 1. Is it common for medical professionals to have varying opinions and frequently revise medication or treatment plans like cardioversion? 2. Is it safe to conduct cardioversion in the absence of a TEE? I presumed that this was a standard procedure to exclude the presence of blood clots. 3. Is it usual practice to have only a chest X-ray prior to moving ahead with cardioversion? 4. How typical is it for patients or their families to not be directly informed about treatment changes and learn about them through nursing staff instead? I recognize that this cannot substitute for professional medical advice. I’m simply trying to discern whether these circumstances are typical or if we should express our concerns more assertively with the healthcare facility. Thank you for your insights!
28-Year-Old Male Experiencing Scalp Sensations Post-Amitriptyline Treatment
I am a 28-year-old man in generally good health, without any cardiac concerns. Approximately a month ago, I encountered intense pain localized to one side of my head, which was unresponsive to paracetamol. However, a single dose of a migraine treatment provided substantial relief. Following that, I began a regimen of amitriptyline, starting at a nightly dose of 10 to 25 mg. While my head pain has diminished significantly—by about 90 to 95%—I now experience occasional uncomfortable sensations on my scalp. These feelings include pins and needles, a cooling sensation, and some crawling feelings near my hairline and ears. There are fleeting moments where I feel brief throbs lasting a second, but I do not have any persistent headaches. To clarify, I do not experience any of the following: - Nausea - Weakness in my limbs - Numbness - Changes in my vision - Coordination difficulties - Seizures The symptoms I have are transient, shifting around and often intensifying when I become conscious of them or as the day progresses. I would like to know: Is it common to experience these sensations during the recovery stage following episodes of neuralgia or migraine-like discomfort? Additionally, could the amitriptyline potentially be causing these temporary paresthetic sensations? I am seeking some reassurance or advice on what is typically observed during this healing process. Thank you.
Concerns About My Toes
Age: 30, Female Currently, I am on the lookout for a reputable podiatrist in my vicinity. However, I've encountered a perplexing issue with my foot. Just last night, I noticed a growth on the side of my toe, something entirely new to me. I maintain a nutritious diet and have a demanding job that requires me to be on my feet quite often. My footwear includes brands such as Brooks Ghost Runners, Hoka Bondi 9’s, and Nike Motiva’s, and I don’t opt for restrictive socks. I also apply Vick’s Vaporub to my feet, a practice handed down from my family, and stick with simple, non-fragrant lotions like Vanicream and CeraVe SA Cream for my skin. In addition, I am curious about the my big toenail's change in color. What might be the underlying reasons for this? Also, I have these persistent dark spots on my toes that I've struggled with since my days on the runway. Despite my efforts, nothing has succeeded in lightening or diminishing their appearance. I'm just looking to determine if there might have been a factor from the past that could have contributed to these issues. I’m not sure what else to include, but I’m open to answering any questions you might have. Thank you for your attention! Best wishes from a worried soul!
7-Month-Old Child with Abernethy Malformation - Exploring Treatment Options
# 7-Month-Old Child with Abernethy Malformation - Exploring Treatment Options ## [7-Month-Old] Identified with Abernethy Malformation (Congenital Portosystemic Shunt) - Treatment Methods? **Age:** 7 months **Gender:** Female **Height:** Age-appropriate **Weight:** Currently 9 kg, was 2.8 kg at birth **Ethnicity:** Asian **Duration of Symptoms:** Present since birth **Location:** Uzbekistan **Pre-existing Health Issues:** Abernethy malformation (congenital portosystemic shunt), liver hemangiomas, chronic jaundice, anemia **Current Treatments:** Supportive management --- ## INITIAL PRESENTATION (June 2025 - July 2025) Our daughter arrived on **June 27, 2025**, presenting with: - Birth weight: **2.8 kg** - Marked jaundice (yellowing of skin and sclera) - Pale or clay-colored stools - **Bilirubin level: 245 μmol/L** (typically <20) An immediate ultrasound indicated multiple liver anomalies, initially thought to be hemangiomas. --- ## FIRST COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT (August 1, 2025 - 1 Month Old) ### Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) with 3-Phase Contrast (August 1, 2025): **RESULTS:** - **Portocaval shunt size: 9.9 mm** (blood bypassing the liver into the inferior vena cava) - **Arteriovenous shunt size: 4.4 mm** - **Portal vein size: 6.1 mm** (patent) - **Three nodular cystic lesions** located in the perivascular area, with largest measuring 11.6×20.7 mm, enhancing during the venous phase - Liver features a heterogeneous architecture, exhibiting irregular enhancement - Gallbladder appears elongated and slightly enlarged - Other abdominal organs exhibit normal findings **RADIOLOGIST’S ASSESSMENT:** "Congenital portosystemic shunt indicative of Abernethy malformation; less likely arteriovenous malformation (AVM); cannot dismiss the possibility of localized liver lesions." **ADVICE:** Seek consultations with an abdominal and vascular surgeon. ### Blood Tests (August 1, 2025): **Complete Blood Count:** - WBC: 10.44 × 10⁹/L (normal range) - **RBC: 2.1 × 10¹²/L** (LOW - indicating severe anemia) - **Hemoglobin: 69 g/L** (CRITICALLY LOW; normal is 117-166) - Platelets: 403 × 10⁹/L (elevated) **Biochemistry Analysis:** - Urea: 1.80 mmol/L (normal) - Creatinine: 33.4 μmol/L (normal) - **ALT: >1000 IU/mL** (EXTREMELY HIGH - severe liver dysfunction) --- ## FOLLOW-UP IMAGING (December 16, 2025 - 5.5 Months Old) ### Liver Ultrasound: **RESULTS:** - Right lobe: 64 mm, left lobe: 43 mm - Liver capsule appears irregular and vague - **Parenchyma: heterogeneous, showing 7 hypo-isoechoic nodules** (sizes range from 11.5×10.7 mm to 17.6×15.4 mm) - Capsule features uneven contours - Blood flow noted during Doppler examination - No dilation in intrahepatic bile ducts - **Portal vein: 3.9 mm** (decreased from 6.1 mm - indicating improvement) - Common bile duct: 1.4 mm - Gallbladder: measures 43.7×9.2 mm (pear-shaped, wall thickness 2.0 mm, homogeneous, free of stones) **ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT:** "Presence of liver volumetric formations (specifically liver hemangiomas)." --- ## LATEST MSCT (February 6, 2026 - 7 Months Old) ### MSCT with 3-Phase Contrast: **FINDINGS:** - Liver remains normal in size, but shows heterogeneous structure with uneven contrast enhancement - **Portocaval shunt: 9.9 mm** (no change, continues to drain directly into the inferior vena cava avoiding liver acinus) - **Arteriovenous shunt: 4.4 mm** (no alteration) - **Three nodular cystic lesions** in perivascular space, maximum size 11.6×20.7 mm, enhancing in the venous phase - **Portal vein: 6.1 mm** (noted during porto-venous phase) - Arteries show no filling abnormalities - Intrahepatic bile ducts remain non-dilated - Gallbladder is elongated and slightly bigger, free from stones - Pancreas: normal - Spleen: measures 66.9×38.5 mm (not enlarged), splenic vein is 3.6 mm - Kidneys: normal placements and structure - No excess fluid detected in the abdominal cavity - No visible changes in lymph nodes **MSCT ANALYSIS:** "Congenital portosystemic shunt indicative of Abernethy malformation, unlikely to be AVM, presence of focal liver lesions cannot be ruled out." **RECOMMENDATION:** Engage with an abdominal and vascular surgeon. --- ## RECENT BLOOD WORK (December 2025 - January 2026) ### Complete Blood Count (January 19, 2026): - WBC: 5.8 × 10⁹/L (SHOWS IMPROVEMENT) - **RBC: 2.93 × 10¹²/L** (IMPROVED but still low) - **Hemoglobin: 72 g/L** (SHOWS IMPROVEMENT but still low) - Platelets: 223 × 10⁹/L (BACK TO NORMAL) - Neutrophils: 30.0% - Lymphocytes: 64.8% - Monocytes: 4.6% ### Biochemistry (January 28, 2026): - Total protein level: 67 g/L (slightly deficient) - Creatinine: 20.7 μmol/L - **Total Bilirubin: 242 μmol/L** (STILL HIGH - unchanged) - **Direct Bilirubin: 142 μmol/L** (VERY HIGH) - **ALT: 50 IU/mL** (DRASTICALLY LOWER from >1000!) --- ## OVERVIEW OF PROGRESS OVER 6 MONTHS | Parameter | August 2025 | January 2026 | Change | |------------------|-------------|---------------|--------------------------| | **Hemoglobin** | 69 g/L | 72 g/L | ↗ Slight improvement | | **RBC** | 2.1 | 2.93 | ↗ Improved | | **ALT** | >1000 | 50 | ✓✓ MAJOR IMPROVEMENT | | **Bilirubin** | 245 | 242 | → Unchanged (still elevated) | | **Portal vein** | 6.1 mm | 3.9 mm (US) | ↗ Decreased | | **Platelets** | 403 | 223 | ↘ Normalized | | **Shunt size** | 9.9 mm | 9.9 mm | → No Change | --- ## CURRENT SITUATION (February 2026 - 7 Months Old) - **Weight:** 9 kg (good growth rate in spite of condition) - **Jaundice:** Continues to be present (yellow skin) - **Stools:** Remain pale/clay-colored - **Development:** Achieving appropriate milestones - **Energy:** Appears to have a good energy level - **Feeding:** Normal appetite --- ## QUESTIONS FOR r/AskDocs We have been informed this is **Type 2 Abernethy malformation** (portal vein present). **Three treatment avenues have been proposed:** ### Option 1: **Endovascular Coil Embolization** (minimally invasive approach) - A catheter is inserted via the leg vein to access the shunt and deploy coils/plugs to close the abnormal vessels - Pros: No surgical incision, minimal discomfort, short hospital stay (2-4 days), no scars, enhanced safety - Duration: 1-2 hours - Recovery: 2-4 weeks for jaundice to show improvement ### Option 2: **Open Surgical Intervention** - An incision in the abdomen to ligate abnormal vessels and redirect blood to the liver - Pros: Direct visualization, effective results - Cons: Surgical scar, longer recovery time (7-14 days in hospital) - Duration: 2-4 hours ### Option 3: **Liver Transplantation** - We have been advised this is not necessary as the portal vein is functional and liver health is improving. --- ## SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER: 1. **With a functional portal vein (6.1 mm) and improving liver function (ALT normalized), is it advisable to pursue endovascular closure as the preferred treatment?** 2. **Despite ALT levels improving, the bilirubin remains consistently high (242). Should this be a cause for concern? Is there a prospect for it to normalize post shunt closure?** 3. **Are the hemangiomas/nodules (11.6×20.7 mm) linked to the shunt? Will they likely resolve following shunt repair?** 4. **How urgent is the proposed intervention? Is immediate action required, or is there flexibility to wait a few months?** 5. **What complications should we be vigilant for during the waiting period?** 6. **Regarding endovascular closure - what is the average success rate for infants aged 7 months? Are there concerns regarding the shunt size (9.9 mm)?** 7. **The measurement of the portal vein has shown improvement from 6.1 mm to 3.9 mm; should this be perceived as a positive sign or a reason for concern?** 8. **Are there special directives (diet modifications, medications) we should consider while awaiting the procedure?** 9. **Post-procedure, how long should we expect it might take for:** - Normalization of bilirubin levels? - Return of stool color to normal? - Resolution of jaundice? - Regression of hemangiomas? 10. **Can you recommend any specialized centers for pediatric Abernethy malformation treatments? We are located in Uzbekistan but are prepared to travel (to Turkey, Russia, South Korea, etc.)** --- ## ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - No family history of hepatic diseases - Pregnancy and delivery were normal - No additional congenital defects identified - Immunizations up to date - No history of bleeding disorders - No signs indicative of encephalopathy - Child is alert and engaged --- **I can supply actual MSCT images and comprehensive lab reports if they would be of assistance.** We sincerely appreciate any insights you can provide. We are striving to make the most informed decision regarding our daughter’s care and highly value expert medical opinions. **TL;DR:** 7-month-old diagnosed with Abernethy Type 2 malformation (9.9 mm portocaval shunt, patent portal vein). Liver functionality is improving (normalized ALT) while bilirubin remains elevated (242). Evaluating options between endovascular coil embolization and open surgery. Seeking expert advice on optimal treatment strategy and timing.
Strange Jelly-Like Substance Observed from Wound
I’m a 21-year-old female living with an auto-inflammatory condition known as hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Recently, I've experienced a concerning issue with one of my wounds. This particular wound causes significant pain and excessive bleeding. However, whenever I attend to it, I tend to find this unusual jelly-like substance present within it. Interestingly, this phenomenon has only occurred with this one wound and not any of the others I have. The bleeding seems to persist until I manage to remove this jelly substance, after which it typically slows down and comes to a halt completely. I’m seeking insights into what this might signify so that I can effectively discuss it with my healthcare provider.