The Rationale Behind Tracking Liver Hemangiomas
I’m a 33-year-old woman weighing 170 pounds and standing at 5'8”, living in the U.S., and I currently have no health concerns. Last year, a routine abdominal ultrasound revealed the presence of a hemangioma by chance. The medical team recommended a follow-up in 6 to 12 months. This year, during another examination, 2 to 3 additional hemangiomas were identified, while the original one remained unchanged. Once again, I was reassured that these growths are benign, yet I’ve been advised to return for another ultrasound in a year's time. If the physicians are confident that these are mere hemangiomas, why is there a necessity for annual monitoring?
Answers (1)
9/4/2025, 11:10:40 PM
OpenHealth AI
The presence of liver hemangiomas can understandably raise questions, especially regarding the rationale for ongoing monitoring. Here are the key points and explanations regarding your situation:
Main Points:
- Benign Nature: Liver hemangiomas are typically benign tumors composed of a tangle of blood vessels and are often asymptomatic.
- Monitoring Necessity: Annual monitoring is recommended to ensure there are no changes in size or number that could warrant closer evaluation.
Explanation:
-
Benign But Variable: Although liver hemangiomas are generally harmless and not cancerous, they can vary in size and number over time. Most do not require treatment, but monitoring helps ensure that they remain stable.
-
Risk of Symptoms or Complications: In rare cases, larger hemangiomas can cause symptoms like abdominal pain or other complications. Tracking their size can help catch any changes early.
-
Reduced Diagnostic Confusion: As more hemangiomas are identified, monitoring helps differentiate between benign hemangiomas and other potential liver lesions that may need further evaluation. This precaution supports safety and clarity in your health care.
Specific, Prioritized Next Steps:
-
Follow-Up Ultrasound: Schedule your next ultrasound as recommended in a year to keep an eye on the hemangiomas and capture any changes.
-
Symptom Awareness: Pay attention to any new symptoms, such as abdominal pain, discomfort, or any other unusual signs. If you notice these, consider discussing them with your healthcare team sooner than your next appointment.
-
Maintain a Healthy Lifestyle: Focus on overall liver health through regular exercise, a balanced diet, and avoiding excessive alcohol consumption, which can benefit your liver function.
It’s normal to have concerns about health monitoring, but it's good to hear that your healthcare team is being proactive. Their approach prioritizes your well-being by ensuring that any potential changes are caught early. If you have further questions or worries, don't hesitate to reach out for more personalized advice.
Related Questions
Seeking Guidance for My Mother's Sudden Hearing Loss Case
I am looking for advice regarding my mother's situation with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). **Patient Overview:** - **Age:** 48 years - **Gender:** Female - **Medical Issues:** Hypothyroidism and overweight (approximately 95 kg at the onset) - **Treatment:** Thyroid medication (25 mcg taken daily) **Medical Background:** In November 2025, my mother experienced an abrupt hearing loss in her right ear accompanied by dizziness and nausea. We consulted several ENT specialists within approximately 36 hours following the onset of her symptoms. She received a diagnosis of SSNHL but unfortunately, she did not undergo intratympanic steroid injections during the critical first 24 hours that could have aided her recovery. Despite receiving subsequent treatment, she has not regained hearing in her affected ear. **Examination Results:** - **Audiogram:** Loss of approximately 100 dB in the right ear; left ear shows normal hearing. - **Brain MRI:** A normal scan was conducted previously, ruling out tumors. - **Laboratory Tests:** Recent blood tests (including thyroid function, HbA1c, renal and liver function tests, CBC, etc.) show elevated TSH (6.73) and a HbA1c of 8.5%. We are currently preparing for a contrast MRI to eliminate the possibility of a vestibular schwannoma or nerve issues. **Current Condition:** The hearing loss persists in her right ear. She is feeling anxious about the upcoming contrast MRI, which involves gadolinium injection. However, she has started making positive lifestyle changes and has lost about 4.5 kg over the past two months, adhering to a protein-rich diet and a walking regimen. **My Inquiries:** 1. Is it still beneficial to perform a contrast MRI several months after the initial SSNHL diagnosis, considering that a normal MRI has already been completed? 2. For cases such as this—severe SSNHL with delayed steroid intervention—are there realistic prospects for hearing recovery at a later date? 3. Are there any additional tests or treatments that should be taken into account at this stage? 4. For family gatherings where loud music will be present, would high-quality earplugs or noise-canceling earbuds be a good option to safeguard her healthier ear? 5. Is it advisable for her to continue with whey protein supplementation and the weight-loss plan? 6. What should we prioritize for long-term management: hearing aids, rehabilitation, regular monitoring, etc.? I recognize that the chances of recovery may be slim, but I want to ensure we are covering all bases and that her care plan is appropriate. I appreciate any insights or suggestions you can offer. Thank you for your assistance!
Seeking Clarity on Medical Notes
Greetings, I’ve chosen to use a throwaway account to keep my medical details private from my main one. My daughter, a 3-year-old with cerebral palsy, is prescribed baclofen, gabapentin, senna, and occasionally, Miralax. She is raised in a smoke-free and alcohol-free environment. Recently, my daughter has exhibited instances of staring and being unresponsive, which we discussed with her pediatric neurologist. These episodes occurred multiple times over three weeks. Concerned about potential seizure activity, we recorded some incidents and shared them with the doctor. He advised us to schedule an EEG, which was set for the soonest available time a week later, while instructing us to call if more episodes occurred. When another episode took place, we reached out to the neurologist, who practices at a children’s hospital approximately two hours away. He recommended that we go to our local emergency room. Upon arriving there, the attending physician reviewed her history but seemed skeptical. After a lengthy wait and attempts to clarify our situation, the on-call neurologist eventually came to see us—although he showed little interest in the video evidence we provided. He proceeded with an EEG that lasted only 15 minutes during which my daughter did not have any episodes. Unfortunately, this neurologist was rather abrupt and seemed dismissive, ultimately sending us home without satisfactory answers. Now, I find myself puzzled. In the EEG report, the neurologist mentioned something called a "teddy bear sign." As I had never encountered this term before, I did some research and discovered that it may suggest that seizure activity is not genuine if the patient is in possession of a stuffed animal or similar item. Is this a legitimate observation? My daughter indeed had her beloved baby doll, which she takes with her everywhere. I fail to comprehend how this could be relevant or why it might indicate that her potential seizure activity is fabricated. I plan to reach out to her primary neurologist to gain deeper insight into the meaning of this "teddy bear sign." Thank you for your help!
Evaluating the Reliability of Blood Tests for Liver Disease
As a 30-year-old man who has indulged in heavy drinking during weekends for the past decade, I recently sought to understand the health of my liver through a blood test conducted at a laboratory. Initially, I felt a wave of relief when I received my results indicating that all my liver enzyme levels were within normal limits. However, my sense of security was short-lived as I stumbled upon information suggesting that some forms of liver disease might not be detectable through standard blood testing. This has prompted me to question the extent to which I can rely on my test results. Is it possible that underlying issues might still exist despite what the blood work revealed?
ENT Inquiry: Can Nasal or Sinus Cancer Develop in 3 Months Post-Normal Endoscopy?
Subject: 62 Years Old Gender: Female Background: Long-standing nasal and sinus issues My mother has grappled with persistent nasal blockages, sinus discomfort, and ear pressure for a considerable period. Approximately three months prior, she underwent a flexible fiberoptic nasal endoscopy, which revealed signs indicative of chronic rhinitis and sinusitis. The examination showcased features such as inflamed and discolored mucosa, enlarged nasal turbinates, and the presence of clear mucus. Importantly, no masses or concerning lesions were identified during this evaluation. Additionally, her oropharyngeal examination yielded normal results. However, during a recent ENT consultation, a “suspicious lesion above the middle turbinate” was identified via endoscopy, which prompted a referral for an “urgent” CT scan (scheduled for three weeks from now, as we reside in Croatia). Currently, she does not exhibit any worsening symptoms such as facial swelling, altered vision, or recurring nosebleeds (two notable nosebleeds occurred around a year ago, but she has not experienced any since then). I have a few inquiries: 1. Is it feasible for a malignant tumor in the nasal or sinus region to arise or become significant within a mere three months, given that a fiberoptic endoscopy conducted three months earlier revealed no alarming findings? 2. Considering this clinical scenario, how much more likely could this be a nasal polyp or chronic inflammatory reaction as opposed to a cancerous growth? 3. Is there a possibility that such a lesion existed three months prior but eluded detection during the fiberoptic endoscopy? I greatly appreciate any guidance you can provide regarding these concerns.
Is It Common for a 9-Year-Old to Experience Facial Paralysis for 6 Months?
At the age of nine, I was told by my father that my smile appeared uneven; essentially, the left side of my face seemed partially paralyzed. Although I could still move it to some degree, blinking was a challenge on that side, which often left my eye feeling dry. We visited the hospital that very day, where they administered laughing gas to facilitate a lumbar puncture due to their suspicion of Lyme disease, along with a blood test to rule out other potential issues. The lumbar puncture was intensely painful, a discomfort I had never experienced before, even with the gas administered to dull the sensation. In the end, the test results yielded no conclusive diagnosis—doctors speculated that a nerve might have been inflamed or something along those lines. Despite having access to free healthcare, the experience was frustrating. To manage my symptoms, I used a patch taped over my eye to help retain moisture, which eventually resolved the issue. Though I suspect that nerve swelling was the culprit, I occasionally find myself reflecting on the incident and wonder if other factors could be responsible.