OpenHealth Q&A

Get answered by medical professionals

Understanding PET CT Report Results

8/10/2025, 10:10:33 PMMale25-34

I am a 58-year-old male who underwent a PET CT scan due to ongoing coughing issues, and I would like to understand the implications of my results. **KEY FINDINGS:** **HEAD:** The brain ventricles and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spaces appear normal with no evidence of mass effect or midline displacement. **NECK:** No signs of hypermetabolic activity were detected in the neck region, and the primary vascular structures show no abnormalities. **THORAX:** In the right lung, a significant finding is an FDG-avid fibro-cavitary lesion situated in the apical and posterior segments of the upper lobe, presenting with diffuse thickening of the septa and heightened uptake of FDG. This lesion measures around 3.6 x 3.3 x 5 cm (anteroposterior x transverse x craniocaudal) with a maximum SUV of 7.2, extending towards the segmental bronchi. Additionally, multiple fibronodular lesions are identified, showing peribronchial involvement and extending to the pleura along with various nodules based around the pleura and fissures, all with increased FDG uptake. The left lung also shows multiple fibronodular formations and thickening of the pleura predominantly in the lower lobe, along with mild pleural effusion observed bilaterally. Right supraclavicular lymph nodes are metabolically active, the largest measuring 1.1 x 0.7 cm with an SUV max of 2.5. Other metabolically active lymph nodes are seen in the prevascular, precarinal, right hilar, and subcarinal areas, with the largest subcarinal node measuring 1 x 0.7 cm (SUV max 2.1). The right axillary lymph node also shows activity, measuring 9 x 7 mm (SUV max 1.2). No abnormal FDG uptake is noted in the heart. **ABDOMEN & PELVIS:** In the liver, a non-FDG avid hypodense lesion in segment V/VI measures 5 mm with an SUV max of 1.4 noted. Lymph nodes exhibiting FDG activity are present in the portacaval, aortocaval, and retrocaval areas, with the portacaval node measuring 9.5 mm (SUV max 1.8). No focal FDG-avid lesions are present in the duodenum or intestines. The spleen, pancreas, bilateral adrenal glands, kidneys, and major abdominal vessels are all observed as normal. The pelvic viscera appear normal as well, with no free fluid or air detected in the abdomen, and the anterior abdominal wall is intact. **OSSEOUS:** An FDG-avid lytic lesion is identified in the L2 vertebra with a maximum SUV of 4.04. **IMPRESSION:** The lesion in the right lung requires further investigation. A metabolically active fibro-cavitary lesion exists in the right upper lobe (apical and posterior), affecting the segmental bronchus. There are multiple nodular changes noted in the peribronchial and pleural regions, alongside fibrotic deposits in both lungs, and mild pleural effusion bilaterally. Metabolically active lymph nodes in the right supraclavicular, axillary, mediastinal, and retroperitoneal areas are also documented. Additionally, a metabolically active lytic lesion localizes to the L2 vertebra. A CT-guided biopsy of the lesion in the right lung’s upper lobe is recommended to exclude the possibility of tuberculosis (Koch's). I would appreciate any insights or clarifications regarding this report.

WellnessInternal MedicinePreventive Medicine

Answers (1)

Cony

8/10/2025, 10:10:49 PM

OpenHealth AI

Main Points: Your PET CT report shows significant findings, particularly in the right lung, where there’s a concerning lesion and multiple affected lymph nodes. It’s paramount to follow up on these findings with a CT-guided biopsy to provide more clarity.

Explanation:

  1. Lung Findings: The report indicated a "fibro-cavitary lesion" in the right lung that is showing increased metabolic activity (indicated by the high SUV value). This could indicate an infection (like tuberculosis) or potentially malignancy, hence the recommendation for a biopsy.

  2. Lymph Nodes: The presence of active lymph nodes in various regions (particularly in the neck and around the lungs) suggests that they are reacting to something occurring in your body, which may correlate with the pathology found in your lung.

  3. Other Lesions: The report also noted a lytic lesion in your lumbar spine (L2) and several other changes in your lungs. These findings need to be interpreted carefully as they could relate to benign or malignant conditions.

Next Steps:

  1. Biopsy the Lung Lesion: Schedule the advised CT-guided biopsy as soon as possible. This will help determine the nature of the lung lesion (infection or malignancy).

  2. Follow-Up Imaging: Discuss with your healthcare provider the need for imaging to evaluate the lytic lesion in your spine, as it may require additional investigation.

  3. Monitor Symptoms: Keep track of any worsening symptoms such as increased coughing, chest pain, or weight loss, and report these to your healthcare provider.

  4. Stay Informed: Ask your healthcare provider to explain terms that are unclear, and discuss what these findings might mean for your overall health and what potential next steps could be.

  5. Emotional Support: Remember, receiving such results can be overwhelming. Ensure you have support, whether through friends, family, or professionals who can help discuss your concerns as you navigate this process.

Understanding your health situation is a priority, and these steps will put you in a position to gain clarity and make informed decisions about your care.

Related Questions

Should I Be Concerned?

Greetings everyone. I’m a 22-year-old woman seeking some guidance. For as long as I can recall, I have noticed these "lumps" on my scalp. They generally match my skin tone and appear stable, showing no signs of growth or change in size. Their height ranges from approximately 1/32 to 1/16 of an inch, if measured generously. I’m curious to know if these should raise any red flags for me. Thank you for your input!

WellnessFamily MedicinePreventive Medicine
Male25-34
43 seconds ago

Inquiry About Childhood Chiropractic Experience

Hello Reddit! I’m reaching out to seek insights regarding an experience from my adolescent years, roughly between the ages of 12 and 14. I’m currently 25 years old (female). To give you a bit of context, I encountered a troubling incident while bending down to access my locker; suddenly, my neck locked in a position to the side, rendering it completely immobile. The pain was unbearable. In response, my father thought it best to take me to a chiropractor, which seemed to provide some relief, yet I continued to endure significant pain and noticed an unusual odor that lingered for nearly a week. Unfortunately, this episode recurred a few months later, and I underwent the same routine; once again, I experienced that odd smell and extreme discomfort. Since those two occurrences, I have faced similar issues on only a couple of occasions, during which I opted for hospital care instead of chiropractic treatment. The medical professionals provided muscle relaxants, which effectively alleviated my pain without any bizarre lingering odor. Since those formative experiences, I have been left with a constant discomfort in my right shoulder, which feels strained frequently, and I find that my head tends to tilt towards one side. What could have caused this neck locking issue during my youth, and could my decision to visit a chiropractor instead of a physician have led to ongoing complications? I'm eager to understand what happened during those situations!

AgingFamily MedicinePreventive Medicine
Male25-34
30 minutes ago

Frustration Over Medical Error: My Child's X-Rays Were of the Wrong Foot

[Patient: A healthy 2.5-year-old boy, average height and weight] I could really use some support right now. A couple of days ago, my toddler injured his foot while playing on a slide at the park. Since then, he hasn't been able to walk without pain or put weight on that foot, only managing to take a few steps at best. We visited his pediatrician, who performed an examination and concluded that the issue was with his left foot. She requested x-rays for that specific foot. After the x-rays were taken, the results indicated no fractures, merely suggesting a soft tissue injury that would require rest. However, after watching him struggle to move today, I've realized that he's actually favoring his left foot, while it’s his right foot that he's avoiding! They took x-rays of the wrong foot! 🤦‍♀️ As a parent, I feel absolutely devastated that this error occurred. I find myself overwhelmed with guilt for putting him through unnecessary radiation exposure. They captured around eight pictures of a foot that isn’t injured at all. The financial aspect—having spent $600 on those x-rays—feels secondary to the worry about the radiation and the continued uncertainty regarding whether there’s an actual injury. I'm feeling extremely upset and incompetent as a mother. Maybe someone could help me understand the radiation risk better? I’m really struggling with this situation.

Family MedicineInternal MedicinePreventive Medicine
Male25-34
50 minutes ago

Seeking Advice on Staying Active with Heart Palpitations

As a 21-year-old standing 6 feet tall and weighing 135 pounds, I've found myself quite inactive recently due to my studies. I had every intention of returning to my usual workout regimen last week, but I ended up experiencing heart palpitations. My physician advised against lifting weights for the time being, and the earliest appointment I could secure with a cardiologist is not until late February. In the interim, I want to maintain my health and keep moving. I’ve set a daily goal of walking between 10,000 and 15,000 steps. However, without access to weights, I’m eager to discover alternative bodyweight exercises that are safe for me to implement. What are some light or gentle activities I could engage in until I receive my evaluation? I initially sought advice on r/bodyweightfitness, but I was directed here for assistance!

ExerciseAgingWellness
Male25-34
1 hour ago

Questions About My Child’s Birth Documentation

Child's Age: 20 months Gender: Male Medical Diagnosis: Benign neutropenia and slightly increased calcium levels (Conditions that we are currently observing with specialists, all of which show no cause for alarm.) While reviewing my son’s birth documentation, I was surprised to come across a note stating "Resuscitated at birth: ..." followed by details I had not anticipated. I was completely unaware that my child had undergone resuscitation. Should this raise any red flags for me? Is it a significant issue that he required supplemental oxygen? I don't recall any unusual events during his delivery. It’s worth noting that we opted for a Cesarean section due to concerning fetal heart tones. Interestingly, I also examined my daughter’s records from a different facility, which contained similar wording, but it did not specify the use of oxygen. Details from the Birth: - Resuscitation Summary: Utilization of oxygen, suctioning, and tactile stimulation. - Additional notes include: baby was born, emitted a spontaneous cry, umbilical cord was cut, taken to a warmer, warmed up, dried off, suctioned, and maintained a strong cry and good muscle tone. A neonatal nurse practitioner administered blow-by oxygen to the infant for a brief period to aid with colorization at five minutes post-birth. Onset of Natural Breathing: Immediate Date and Time of Birth: 03/06/2024 Delivery Attending: Delivery Method: Primary Cesarean Section Apgar Score at 1 minute: 8 Apgar Score at 5 minutes: 9 Infant's Birth Weight: 4.08 kg Infant's Birth Length: 53.5 cm

AgingFamily MedicinePreventive Medicine
Male25-34
1 hour ago