OpenHealth Q&A

Get answered by medical professionals

General Anesthesia for Removal of a Lipoma in the Lower Back

7/13/2025, 7:10:29 PMMale25-34

A 30-year-old male, standing 5’10” and weighing 225 pounds, presents with no significant health concerns. He has endured persistent back pain since the age of 15, which he has managed intermittently through physical therapy. While the therapy offers temporary relief, it fails to address the underlying issue. Common advice he receives includes strengthening his core and increasing flexibility. Coinciding with the onset of his back discomfort, he also became aware of a lipoma located on his lower back. Throughout his life, he was assured that such growths were not associated with back pain. Now at 30, after beginning a career in nursing, he recognizes that his back pain is unusual and warrants further examination. Initially, at age 15, he underwent X-rays focused on his lumbar and sacroiliac areas, both of which yielded normal results. His perspective shifted upon reading about individuals experiencing similar pain linked to their lipomas. Seeking clarity, he consulted his brother, a third-year radiology resident, who confirmed that lipomas could indeed be a source of discomfort. The nature of his pain is localized to the right side of his lower back, approximately 1.5 to 2 inches from the spine, near the area commonly referred to as the dimples of Venus. He describes the sensation as a constant ache that does not radiate into his legs, and there is no accompanying numbness or tingling. The discomfort manifests as significant stiffness and soreness, particularly noticeable in the morning, exacerbated by prolonged sitting or walking. This side feels perpetually tense and unstable. Following an X-ray of the sacroiliac joint that also returned negative results, an ultrasound was conducted to verify the presence of the lipoma, which measured 1.4 x 1.2 x 2.2 cm. Based on the findings, the radiologist suggested surgical intervention, which led him to request a consultation with a surgeon. He anticipated being informed that the lipoma was unlikely the source of his pain. Upon entering the examination room, the surgeon mentioned he had heard about the lumps on his back. After examining the area, he swiftly agreed to proceed with the removal, surprising the patient. The surgeon, who had considerable experience, asserted that while this phenomenon typically isn’t documented in textbooks, he had encountered numerous cases where removing lipomas relieved patients of chronic low back pain with unremarkable imaging results. He informed the patient that general anesthesia would be utilized during the procedure, which would last approximately two hours from the beginning of IV administration until waking up. However, the patient expressed concern as his brother, who tends to prioritize textbook guidelines, had previously stated that general anesthesia would generally not be used. Initially dismissing the idea when the patient mentioned his girlfriend's mother’s understanding of the procedure, the brother was taken aback when updated on the surgical consultation outcomes and the anticipated duration. The discussion also covered potential reasons for the length of the procedure, including the need for thorough removal due to the possibility of the lipoma fragmenting, with some methods involving cauterization. Emphasizing that the planned sedation is true general anesthesia rather than twilight sedation, the patient, as a nurse, acknowledges that while using general anesthesia isn’t the preferred route, it remains a safe option. He questions the typicality of employing general anesthesia for lipoma excision on the back and considers whether remaining conscious during the procedure is preferable, particularly as the lipoma is not visible without palpation. The surgeon may have valid concerns regarding patient movement during the operation. Moreover, the brother didn’t feel an MRI was necessary, given the absence of nerve-related symptoms, positing that severe arthritis would manifest on an X-ray. The patient voiced worries about conditions like ankylosing spondylitis due to morning stiffness, but was reassured that any such significant changes would be evident on an X-ray, noting that his posture appeared unaffected. He remains convinced that the lipoma is the cause of his issues, particularly since the pain feels as though it emanates from it, and it has not changed in size over the past 15 years.

ArthritisCrohn's DiseaseThyroid Disorders

Answers (1)

Cony

7/13/2025, 7:10:46 PM

OpenHealth AI

It's understandable to have concerns regarding the use of general anesthesia for your lipoma removal, particularly given its implications and your background in nursing. Here’s a breakdown of the key points and guidance for your situation.

Key Points

  1. Lipoma and Pain Connection: While lipomas are generally considered benign and often not associated with pain, your personal experience and the surgeon's insights suggest a potential link in your case.
  2. General Anesthesia Considerations: General anesthesia can be warranted, especially if the surgical procedure requires the patient to be completely still. This is particularly crucial for surgery on the back, where movement can complicate the process.
  3. Your Symptoms: Your ongoing back pain, stiffness, and the location of the lipoma near the painful area makes the situation unique, warranting further attention.

Explanation

Lipomas can sometimes contribute to discomfort depending on their size and location, especially if they are pressing on nerves or surrounding structures. Although it's true that many lipoma removals are performed under local anesthesia, if deeper tissues are involved or if patient movement is a concern, general anesthesia may be a safer choice for both you and the medical team.

Next Steps

  1. Clarify Anesthesia Options: Consider discussing the anesthesia plan in further detail with your surgeon. Ask about the possibility and implications of regional or local anesthesia options, especially since you have hesitations regarding general anesthesia.

  2. Express Concerns: Clearly communicate your worries about general anesthesia to your surgeon. They can explain the rationale based on their experience and may even assure you of safety protocols in place to minimize risks.

  3. Monitor Symptoms: While you await the procedure, keep a detailed record of your symptoms, including any changes in pain levels, stiffness, or relationships to activities. This will help you discuss any observations with your healthcare provider later.

  4. Pre-Surgery Preparations: Ensure you follow any pre-operative instructions regarding fasting or medication adjustments. If you are anxious, explore relaxation techniques to help manage stress leading up to your surgery.

  5. Post-Procedure Follow-Up: After the surgery, keep an eye on your recovery and follow any post-operative care recommendations closely. This includes managing pain and monitoring for any signs of infection at the surgical site.

Remember, it's essential to feel comfortable with your care plan, so ensure your questions and concerns are addressed prior to the surgery. Your proactive approach will help in achieving the relief you're seeking.

Related Questions

Understanding Atrial Fibrillation and Thyroid Issues: Variability in Cardioversion Decisions

Hello everyone, I’m reaching out for guidance regarding my mother’s current health situation, and I’d greatly appreciate any shared experiences or thoughts. **My mother's background:** - **Age**: 55 years - **Weight**: Recently dropped to 116 kg from 118 kg in just two days, likely due to diuretics. - **Health history**: Previously an underactive thyroid, undiagnosed and untreated, now presenting as overactive. - **Medications**: Currently taking thyroid medication and a beta-blocker (Rapiblock). **Current health status:** My mother has been hospitalized since Tuesday, experiencing **atrial fibrillation with heart rates exceeding 200** beats per minute due to her thyroid's hyperactivity. - The plan for cardioversion was initially settled on Tuesday. However, the following day, the medical team advised postponing it until her thyroid levels could be stabilized, believing that her heart rate would return to normal once her thyroid condition was managed. - Her **obesity** precludes her from undergoing a transthoracic echocardiogram, and due to her thyroid concerns, she cannot handle contrast dye (this has been a consistent issue for over four years). Therefore, the only feasible option was a **transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)**, which has yet to be performed. - She has been prescribed various medications including beta-blockers and thyroid treatments in the past. - On Friday, a doctor proposed proceeding with cardioversion; however, the attending senior physician objected. - Today (Saturday), another clinician has expressed a desire to move forward with cardioversion, having initiated a new medication, as the senior physician is unavailable. - **Communication has been unclear**, as we were notified of developments by a nurse rather than the physician in charge, causing confusion and anxiety. - Currently, only a **chest X-ray** is scheduled, and the TEE remains unaddressed. **My inquiries are as follows:** 1. Is it common for medical professionals to have varying opinions and frequently revise medication or treatment plans like cardioversion? 2. Is it safe to conduct cardioversion in the absence of a TEE? I presumed that this was a standard procedure to exclude the presence of blood clots. 3. Is it usual practice to have only a chest X-ray prior to moving ahead with cardioversion? 4. How typical is it for patients or their families to not be directly informed about treatment changes and learn about them through nursing staff instead? I recognize that this cannot substitute for professional medical advice. I’m simply trying to discern whether these circumstances are typical or if we should express our concerns more assertively with the healthcare facility. Thank you for your insights!

Thyroid DisordersEndocrinologyRheumatology
Male25-34
5 minutes ago

28-Year-Old Male Experiencing Scalp Sensations Post-Amitriptyline Treatment

I am a 28-year-old man in generally good health, without any cardiac concerns. Approximately a month ago, I encountered intense pain localized to one side of my head, which was unresponsive to paracetamol. However, a single dose of a migraine treatment provided substantial relief. Following that, I began a regimen of amitriptyline, starting at a nightly dose of 10 to 25 mg. While my head pain has diminished significantly—by about 90 to 95%—I now experience occasional uncomfortable sensations on my scalp. These feelings include pins and needles, a cooling sensation, and some crawling feelings near my hairline and ears. There are fleeting moments where I feel brief throbs lasting a second, but I do not have any persistent headaches. To clarify, I do not experience any of the following: - Nausea - Weakness in my limbs - Numbness - Changes in my vision - Coordination difficulties - Seizures The symptoms I have are transient, shifting around and often intensifying when I become conscious of them or as the day progresses. I would like to know: Is it common to experience these sensations during the recovery stage following episodes of neuralgia or migraine-like discomfort? Additionally, could the amitriptyline potentially be causing these temporary paresthetic sensations? I am seeking some reassurance or advice on what is typically observed during this healing process. Thank you.

Multiple SclerosisCrohn's DiseaseEndocrinology
Male25-34
1 hour ago

Concerns About My Toes

Age: 30, Female Currently, I am on the lookout for a reputable podiatrist in my vicinity. However, I've encountered a perplexing issue with my foot. Just last night, I noticed a growth on the side of my toe, something entirely new to me. I maintain a nutritious diet and have a demanding job that requires me to be on my feet quite often. My footwear includes brands such as Brooks Ghost Runners, Hoka Bondi 9’s, and Nike Motiva’s, and I don’t opt for restrictive socks. I also apply Vick’s Vaporub to my feet, a practice handed down from my family, and stick with simple, non-fragrant lotions like Vanicream and CeraVe SA Cream for my skin. In addition, I am curious about the my big toenail's change in color. What might be the underlying reasons for this? Also, I have these persistent dark spots on my toes that I've struggled with since my days on the runway. Despite my efforts, nothing has succeeded in lightening or diminishing their appearance. I'm just looking to determine if there might have been a factor from the past that could have contributed to these issues. I’m not sure what else to include, but I’m open to answering any questions you might have. Thank you for your attention! Best wishes from a worried soul!

ArthritisFibromyalgiaInternal Medicine
Male25-34
1 hour ago

7-Month-Old Child with Abernethy Malformation - Exploring Treatment Options

# 7-Month-Old Child with Abernethy Malformation - Exploring Treatment Options ## [7-Month-Old] Identified with Abernethy Malformation (Congenital Portosystemic Shunt) - Treatment Methods? **Age:** 7 months **Gender:** Female **Height:** Age-appropriate **Weight:** Currently 9 kg, was 2.8 kg at birth **Ethnicity:** Asian **Duration of Symptoms:** Present since birth **Location:** Uzbekistan **Pre-existing Health Issues:** Abernethy malformation (congenital portosystemic shunt), liver hemangiomas, chronic jaundice, anemia **Current Treatments:** Supportive management --- ## INITIAL PRESENTATION (June 2025 - July 2025) Our daughter arrived on **June 27, 2025**, presenting with: - Birth weight: **2.8 kg** - Marked jaundice (yellowing of skin and sclera) - Pale or clay-colored stools - **Bilirubin level: 245 μmol/L** (typically <20) An immediate ultrasound indicated multiple liver anomalies, initially thought to be hemangiomas. --- ## FIRST COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT (August 1, 2025 - 1 Month Old) ### Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) with 3-Phase Contrast (August 1, 2025): **RESULTS:** - **Portocaval shunt size: 9.9 mm** (blood bypassing the liver into the inferior vena cava) - **Arteriovenous shunt size: 4.4 mm** - **Portal vein size: 6.1 mm** (patent) - **Three nodular cystic lesions** located in the perivascular area, with largest measuring 11.6×20.7 mm, enhancing during the venous phase - Liver features a heterogeneous architecture, exhibiting irregular enhancement - Gallbladder appears elongated and slightly enlarged - Other abdominal organs exhibit normal findings **RADIOLOGIST’S ASSESSMENT:** "Congenital portosystemic shunt indicative of Abernethy malformation; less likely arteriovenous malformation (AVM); cannot dismiss the possibility of localized liver lesions." **ADVICE:** Seek consultations with an abdominal and vascular surgeon. ### Blood Tests (August 1, 2025): **Complete Blood Count:** - WBC: 10.44 × 10⁹/L (normal range) - **RBC: 2.1 × 10¹²/L** (LOW - indicating severe anemia) - **Hemoglobin: 69 g/L** (CRITICALLY LOW; normal is 117-166) - Platelets: 403 × 10⁹/L (elevated) **Biochemistry Analysis:** - Urea: 1.80 mmol/L (normal) - Creatinine: 33.4 μmol/L (normal) - **ALT: >1000 IU/mL** (EXTREMELY HIGH - severe liver dysfunction) --- ## FOLLOW-UP IMAGING (December 16, 2025 - 5.5 Months Old) ### Liver Ultrasound: **RESULTS:** - Right lobe: 64 mm, left lobe: 43 mm - Liver capsule appears irregular and vague - **Parenchyma: heterogeneous, showing 7 hypo-isoechoic nodules** (sizes range from 11.5×10.7 mm to 17.6×15.4 mm) - Capsule features uneven contours - Blood flow noted during Doppler examination - No dilation in intrahepatic bile ducts - **Portal vein: 3.9 mm** (decreased from 6.1 mm - indicating improvement) - Common bile duct: 1.4 mm - Gallbladder: measures 43.7×9.2 mm (pear-shaped, wall thickness 2.0 mm, homogeneous, free of stones) **ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT:** "Presence of liver volumetric formations (specifically liver hemangiomas)." --- ## LATEST MSCT (February 6, 2026 - 7 Months Old) ### MSCT with 3-Phase Contrast: **FINDINGS:** - Liver remains normal in size, but shows heterogeneous structure with uneven contrast enhancement - **Portocaval shunt: 9.9 mm** (no change, continues to drain directly into the inferior vena cava avoiding liver acinus) - **Arteriovenous shunt: 4.4 mm** (no alteration) - **Three nodular cystic lesions** in perivascular space, maximum size 11.6×20.7 mm, enhancing in the venous phase - **Portal vein: 6.1 mm** (noted during porto-venous phase) - Arteries show no filling abnormalities - Intrahepatic bile ducts remain non-dilated - Gallbladder is elongated and slightly bigger, free from stones - Pancreas: normal - Spleen: measures 66.9×38.5 mm (not enlarged), splenic vein is 3.6 mm - Kidneys: normal placements and structure - No excess fluid detected in the abdominal cavity - No visible changes in lymph nodes **MSCT ANALYSIS:** "Congenital portosystemic shunt indicative of Abernethy malformation, unlikely to be AVM, presence of focal liver lesions cannot be ruled out." **RECOMMENDATION:** Engage with an abdominal and vascular surgeon. --- ## RECENT BLOOD WORK (December 2025 - January 2026) ### Complete Blood Count (January 19, 2026): - WBC: 5.8 × 10⁹/L (SHOWS IMPROVEMENT) - **RBC: 2.93 × 10¹²/L** (IMPROVED but still low) - **Hemoglobin: 72 g/L** (SHOWS IMPROVEMENT but still low) - Platelets: 223 × 10⁹/L (BACK TO NORMAL) - Neutrophils: 30.0% - Lymphocytes: 64.8% - Monocytes: 4.6% ### Biochemistry (January 28, 2026): - Total protein level: 67 g/L (slightly deficient) - Creatinine: 20.7 μmol/L - **Total Bilirubin: 242 μmol/L** (STILL HIGH - unchanged) - **Direct Bilirubin: 142 μmol/L** (VERY HIGH) - **ALT: 50 IU/mL** (DRASTICALLY LOWER from >1000!) --- ## OVERVIEW OF PROGRESS OVER 6 MONTHS | Parameter | August 2025 | January 2026 | Change | |------------------|-------------|---------------|--------------------------| | **Hemoglobin** | 69 g/L | 72 g/L | ↗ Slight improvement | | **RBC** | 2.1 | 2.93 | ↗ Improved | | **ALT** | >1000 | 50 | ✓✓ MAJOR IMPROVEMENT | | **Bilirubin** | 245 | 242 | → Unchanged (still elevated) | | **Portal vein** | 6.1 mm | 3.9 mm (US) | ↗ Decreased | | **Platelets** | 403 | 223 | ↘ Normalized | | **Shunt size** | 9.9 mm | 9.9 mm | → No Change | --- ## CURRENT SITUATION (February 2026 - 7 Months Old) - **Weight:** 9 kg (good growth rate in spite of condition) - **Jaundice:** Continues to be present (yellow skin) - **Stools:** Remain pale/clay-colored - **Development:** Achieving appropriate milestones - **Energy:** Appears to have a good energy level - **Feeding:** Normal appetite --- ## QUESTIONS FOR r/AskDocs We have been informed this is **Type 2 Abernethy malformation** (portal vein present). **Three treatment avenues have been proposed:** ### Option 1: **Endovascular Coil Embolization** (minimally invasive approach) - A catheter is inserted via the leg vein to access the shunt and deploy coils/plugs to close the abnormal vessels - Pros: No surgical incision, minimal discomfort, short hospital stay (2-4 days), no scars, enhanced safety - Duration: 1-2 hours - Recovery: 2-4 weeks for jaundice to show improvement ### Option 2: **Open Surgical Intervention** - An incision in the abdomen to ligate abnormal vessels and redirect blood to the liver - Pros: Direct visualization, effective results - Cons: Surgical scar, longer recovery time (7-14 days in hospital) - Duration: 2-4 hours ### Option 3: **Liver Transplantation** - We have been advised this is not necessary as the portal vein is functional and liver health is improving. --- ## SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER: 1. **With a functional portal vein (6.1 mm) and improving liver function (ALT normalized), is it advisable to pursue endovascular closure as the preferred treatment?** 2. **Despite ALT levels improving, the bilirubin remains consistently high (242). Should this be a cause for concern? Is there a prospect for it to normalize post shunt closure?** 3. **Are the hemangiomas/nodules (11.6×20.7 mm) linked to the shunt? Will they likely resolve following shunt repair?** 4. **How urgent is the proposed intervention? Is immediate action required, or is there flexibility to wait a few months?** 5. **What complications should we be vigilant for during the waiting period?** 6. **Regarding endovascular closure - what is the average success rate for infants aged 7 months? Are there concerns regarding the shunt size (9.9 mm)?** 7. **The measurement of the portal vein has shown improvement from 6.1 mm to 3.9 mm; should this be perceived as a positive sign or a reason for concern?** 8. **Are there special directives (diet modifications, medications) we should consider while awaiting the procedure?** 9. **Post-procedure, how long should we expect it might take for:** - Normalization of bilirubin levels? - Return of stool color to normal? - Resolution of jaundice? - Regression of hemangiomas? 10. **Can you recommend any specialized centers for pediatric Abernethy malformation treatments? We are located in Uzbekistan but are prepared to travel (to Turkey, Russia, South Korea, etc.)** --- ## ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - No family history of hepatic diseases - Pregnancy and delivery were normal - No additional congenital defects identified - Immunizations up to date - No history of bleeding disorders - No signs indicative of encephalopathy - Child is alert and engaged --- **I can supply actual MSCT images and comprehensive lab reports if they would be of assistance.** We sincerely appreciate any insights you can provide. We are striving to make the most informed decision regarding our daughter’s care and highly value expert medical opinions. **TL;DR:** 7-month-old diagnosed with Abernethy Type 2 malformation (9.9 mm portocaval shunt, patent portal vein). Liver functionality is improving (normalized ALT) while bilirubin remains elevated (242). Evaluating options between endovascular coil embolization and open surgery. Seeking expert advice on optimal treatment strategy and timing.

Thyroid DisordersInternal MedicineEndocrinology
Male25-34
1 hour ago

Strange Jelly-Like Substance Observed from Wound

I’m a 21-year-old female living with an auto-inflammatory condition known as hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Recently, I've experienced a concerning issue with one of my wounds. This particular wound causes significant pain and excessive bleeding. However, whenever I attend to it, I tend to find this unusual jelly-like substance present within it. Interestingly, this phenomenon has only occurred with this one wound and not any of the others I have. The bleeding seems to persist until I manage to remove this jelly substance, after which it typically slows down and comes to a halt completely. I’m seeking insights into what this might signify so that I can effectively discuss it with my healthcare provider.

ArthritisFibromyalgiaInternal Medicine
Male25-34
3 hours ago