Concerns About Possible Incision Infection
Greetings everyone. I underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy through my navel just over a week ago, and I’m starting to feel anxious that my surgical site might be infected. Although my temperature has been consistently hovering around 99°F, indicating I do not have a fever, the area around the incision remains quite tender, and I've noticed some discharge. I’m doing my best to maintain cleanliness by gently applying soap to the incision during showers, as advised. After washing, I ensure it dries properly. I wonder if perhaps I’ve been overexerting myself without allowing sufficient time to rest. I returned to work five days after the surgery, where I am on my feet for extended shifts of over ten hours daily, and I also have three young children at home. While I’ve been cautious not to lift anything heavy, it’s been a challenge to balance everything. I’ve reached out to my surgeon's office for assistance, but they haven’t responded yet. I hope to connect with them tomorrow, but I would appreciate any insights or advice in the meantime.
Answers (1)

7/2/2025, 4:10:33 AM
OpenHealth AI
It's understandable to feel anxious about potential infection after surgery, especially with your recent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. While some tenderness and a small amount of discharge can be normal, it's important to monitor these symptoms closely to ensure they don't indicate an infection.
Explanation
After such a procedure, the incision site can be sensitive, and the body's healing process may lead to some tenderness. A low-grade fever (around 99°F) isn't unusual, but it can also be a sign that your body is responding to stress. The combination of discharge and tenderness, especially if you're feeling fatigued or overexerted, warrants careful attention. It's great that you're keeping the area clean, but other factors, including rest, play a significant role in recovery.
Next Steps
-
Monitor Symptoms: Keep an eye on the incision site for any signs of worsening: increased redness, swelling, a significant increase in discharge, or a rise in fever (over 100.4°F). If any of these occur, prioritize seeking medical attention.
-
Rest and Limit Activity: Since you've returned to work and are on your feet for long shifts, consider reducing your physical activity. Try to take breaks when you can and avoid strenuous tasks to allow your body time to heal.
-
Incision Care: Continue to keep the area clean but avoid scrubbing it harshly. After gentle cleaning, ensure it dries thoroughly. If you apply any ointment as instructed by your doctor, do so carefully.
-
Hydration and Nutrition: Focus on staying hydrated and eating a balanced diet to support your recovery process.
-
Follow Up: Since you've already reached out to your surgeon's office, make sure to follow up with them tomorrow. It's crucial to have professional guidance, especially if your symptoms persist or worsen.
Feeling anxious is common, especially when managing recovery with a busy home and work life. Prioritizing your health will ultimately benefit both you and your family as you heal. Please let me know if you have any further questions or need more specific advice!
Related Questions
Is Further Investigation Necessary Based on These Findings?
A 58-year-old woman, currently in good health without any notable medical issues, is under statin medication. She recently underwent her annual checkup with her general practitioner, and the tests performed, including a complete blood count (CBC) and metabolic panel, returned results within normal limits. However, she also completed the Functional Health 100 biomarker assessment, which revealed an autoimmune marker level of 1:160, showing a homogeneous result. Despite exhibiting no symptoms related to autoimmune disorders, she is feeling anxious about these findings. The prolonged wait for an appointment with a rheumatologist has added to her distress, leading her to question whether additional follow-up is necessary regarding these results.
Experiencing ETD Again After Four Years
I am a 23-year-old woman weighing 115 pounds, and I have no significant medical history or current medications. Approximately four years ago, I dealt with eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) in one ear, which was effectively treated with afrin and flonase. Recently, after falling ill, I noticed the condition reemerging but found relief once more through the same nasal sprays. However, six months later, the issue resurfaced yet again, only to dissipate after the same treatment. Currently, it has been three weeks since the symptoms returned. This time, I suspect that allergies might be the culprit, although I have not experienced allergy problems before. In fact, a long time ago, my doctor mentioned that I might be allergic to grass. It’s the same ear being affected, and while the discomfort isn’t severe—just a sensation of popping and some buildup—it’s definitely irritating. I don’t have any additional symptoms, but I occasionally feel some dryness and congestion in my sinuses, which makes them feel blocked. It's not like traditional congestion; it just feels uncomfortable. I’m in need of assistance because while afrin can provide temporary relief, I know I shouldn’t rely on it constantly. I also tried sudafed during the first episode, but it did not seem to help at all.
Understanding Brain MRIs in Relation to MS
As a 40-year-old woman, I’ve been experiencing a gradual progression of neurological symptoms for the past six to seven years. Approximately five years ago, I underwent MRI scans of both my brain and spine. The results revealed a few unspecified lesions, yet they were insufficient to diagnose multiple sclerosis (MS), nor did they shed light on my ongoing issues. I’ve heard that MS often begins manifesting in women during their 40s. I am curious to know if my current symptoms could be exclusive to this condition, or if they might remain undetected in scans until later stages. Given my previous MRI results were unremarkable five years back, would it have shown more evidence of MS if I were to develop it now? Or is it possible for those scans to still be normal, despite my current condition?
Seeking Insights from Cardiologists on Invasive Exercise Test Findings
I’m reaching out in the hope that a cardiologist or a healthcare expert can assist me with the interpretation of my recent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise test, which included right heart catheterization. For several years, I have been coping with debilitating symptoms such as breathlessness, poor exercise tolerance, muscle fatigue, orthostatic issues, and recently, hypotension after meals. My daily life is significantly affected, and I often find myself needing to use a wheelchair. Unfortunately, the only diagnosis provided to me thus far has been ‘deconditioning’, which does not begin to account for the intensity or nature of my symptoms. The central question that remains unclear to me is this: Although my pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and right atrial pressure (RAP) readings appear normal both at rest and during exercise, both my cardiac output and cardiac index are remarkably high at the baseline and during physical activity. The increase in stroke volume is minimal, with the rise in cardiac output primarily due to a heightened heart rate, which points to a potential preload failure. Research indicates that: "With inadequate preload, the stroke volume quickly plateaus and any further increase in cardiac output is due to an elevation in heart rate." This aligns perfectly with what my hemodynamic data reflects. Additionally, my upright PCWP measures a mere 5 mmHg, indicating a state of preload deficiency, although I was adequately hydrated prior to the test, which might have concealed further declines in this measure. Here are some key symptoms I am experiencing: - Shortness of breath that worsens with changes in posture and during meals (e.g., lying on my side exacerbates hypotension) - Muscle fatigue and burning sensations triggered by minimal exertion - A rapid increase in heart rate with exertion, despite already elevated cardiac output at rest - Notable decline following administration of Fludrocortisone, which resulted in acute decompensation - Absence of congestion - Normal results from MRI, echocardiogram, and blood analyses (like BNP) Prominent abnormalities noted in my tests include: - Increased cardiac output at rest and during exercise - Persistent low-normal PCWP, with a drop when standing - Compromised stroke volume reserve - Low oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) of 1635 (with normal being greater than 3599) - Elevated ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide (VE/VCO₂ slope) at 31 - Suboptimal VO₂ response despite significant effort (respiratory exchange ratio greater than 1.2, peak heart rate exceeding 100%) - Indications of impaired peripheral oxygen extraction as suggested by VO₂/HR and dCO/dVO₂ slope This situation appears to reflect a form of preload failure accompanied by high-output physiology, perhaps signaling early or masked heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or an issue with autonomic regulation of circulation. I’ve come across literature on similar presentations related to preload deficiency and high-output scenarios but have yet to engage a specialist who is willing to take my concerns seriously. Could this be classified as a type of heart failure? Why does it not fit the criteria for high-output heart failure or preload failure? Your thoughts would be immensely valuable; this journey has been profoundly challenging, and I am eager for explanations that resonate with my physiological experiences. I am a 45-year-old male with a history of Sick Sinus Syndrome and a pacemaker, in addition to obesity, MASLD, and low testosterone levels.
Concerns About Small Hypodense Lesions on the Kidneys
Greetings, I am a 29-year-old woman who occasionally drinks alcohol and smokes. Recently, I've been experiencing urinary tract infections (UTIs) and have been informed that my bladder wall is "mildly thick." Last night, I visited the emergency room due to discomfort in my lower right abdomen. During my visit, they diagnosed me with a UTI and identified the presence of ovarian cysts after performing a CT scan. However, the attending physician did not discuss anything regarding "small hypodense lesions on both kidneys, too small to characterize." Instead, I was discharged with just the UTI diagnosis. Now, I find myself anxious and fearing the possibility of something more serious, like cancer, being overlooked. I have a follow-up appointment scheduled with my primary care physician in two weeks, but I am eager to understand what these findings might indicate. Any insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.