Understanding Elevated Hounsfield Units in CT Scan of Adrenal Tumor
Following an abnormal increase in DHEA levels observed in my blood tests, a non-contrast CT scan revealed a minor nodule on my adrenal gland. Recently, I received the results from a subsequent CT scan that utilized contrast, and I find myself quite anxious about the findings. The increased Hounsfield units are particularly concerning to me, especially given my limited understanding of these measurements. Medical professionals suspect it may be a pheochromocytoma, which raises my anxiety further as I've come across information suggesting that surgical removal can pose significant risks and that specific precautions must be taken. Additionally, I am apprehensive about the potential for cancerous developments. I seek help to comprehend these results better while I await my follow-up visit with my endocrinologist to discuss the findings further. Any insights into what the surgical procedure might entail would also be greatly appreciated. While I do not experience high blood pressure, I do deal with considerable anxiety and occasional spikes in heart rate for no apparent reason. **Results Interpretation:** - Nodule identified on the right adrenal gland measures 1.2 cm. - Pre-contrast Hounsfield units are recorded at 36.2. - Hounsfield units during the portal venous phase are observed at 176.9. - Delayed washout shows Hounsfield units of 71.8. - The absolute washout percentage is calculated at 74.7% while the relative washout is at 59.4%. - These metrics are indicative of an adenoma; however, the notably elevated Hounsfield units during the portal venous phase suggest the possibility of pheochromocytoma, warranting biochemical correlation for accurate diagnosis.
Answers (1)
3/18/2025, 4:20:55 PM
OpenHealth AI
Your concern about the results of your CT scan is completely understandable, especially given the potential implications of an elevated Hounsfield unit in the context of a nodule on your adrenal gland. Here's a simplified explanation and guidance on what comes next.
Main Points:
- Understanding Hounsfield Units: Elevated Hounsfield units on a CT scan can suggest different types of tissue characteristics. Higher values during the contrast phase can indicate increased vascularity or possibly certain tumors.
- Potential Diagnosis: The combination of your scan results may suggest a pheochromocytoma, a type of tumor associated with adrenal glands, but it may also just be an adrenal adenoma.
- Anxiety Management & Next Steps: Your anxieties are valid, and it’s crucial to manage them while awaiting further evaluations and recommendations from your endocrinologist.
Explanation:
Hounsfield Units: These are measurements used in CT scans to assess the density of tissues. Values between 0 and 100 typically indicate different types of soft tissues, and in your case:
- Normal Tissue: Around 0 (like water).
- Adrenals/Adenomas: Generally lower, like the pre-contrast unit you mentioned (36.2).
- Elevated Units (like 176.9 during the contrast phase): This suggests denser tissue, which could potentially indicate a tumor like pheochromocytoma.
What This Might Mean: Although your results raise suspicion for pheochromocytoma, other non-cancerous conditions can also cause elevated levels. Your healthcare team will perform biochemical tests to correlate these findings and clarify the diagnosis.
Next Steps:
- Monitor Your Symptoms: Keep track of how you're feeling, especially noting any episodes of increased heart rate or significant anxiety. Try to document any patterns.
- Manage Anxiety: Engage in relaxation techniques such as deep breathing, meditation, or light exercise to help reduce anxiety while you await more information. Some people find mindfulness or yoga helpful.
- Prepare for Your Endocrinologist Visit: Make a list of questions or concerns you want to discuss during your appointment. Questions about the risks associated with surgery, the procedure itself, and follow-up care are valid and important.
- Consider Getting More Information: Look into educational resources on pheochromocytoma from reputable organizations (like the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons) to better understand your condition and its treatment options.
Remember, your healthcare team, including your endocrinologist, is there to support you and guide you through the next steps. Take it one day at a time, and it’s okay to seek support from friends or family as you navigate this.
Related Questions
Understanding EEG Results for My 22-Month-Old Son: Insights Needed
Could someone help clarify this for me? My son, who is just 22 months old, hasn’t started walking yet, becomes tired easily, and has been experiencing behavioral outbursts. He had a febrile seizure in February 2025, followed by another unexplained seizure in April 2025, which led us to consult a neurologist. Since he was 3 months old, he has been receiving therapy from a physical therapist for torticollis. At birth, he spent five days in the NICU due to issues with meconium aspiration. A recent MRI showed normal results, and he also had a follow-up EEG after one conducted in July 2025. The results from this recent EEG were abnormal for a pediatric patient in awake, drowsy, and sleeping states. Notably, there were brief episodes of left frontotemporal delta slowing, which occurred mainly when he was awake and drowsy. There were no signs of epileptiform activity detected. In contrast, the EEG performed back on July 3, 2025, was deemed normal for both awake and drowsy states, again with no evidence of epileptiform irregularities, although it did not capture any sleep data. This examination was prompted by the child's existing history of febrile seizures. Importantly, he is not currently on any anti-seizure medications. The EEG procedure used standard electrode placements per the 10-20 system, conducted a single-lead EKG, and included continuous video monitoring. During the analysis, the background activity was symmetric, indicating some anterior-posterior (AP) organization, with a dominant rhythm of 50-80 microvolts at 7 Hz. His drowsy state was marked by a reduced amount of eye blink activity, less breathing motion interference, and a generalized slowing in theta/delta frequencies. Stage II sleep exhibited spindles and vertex waves patterns. Additionally, there were intermittent bursts of 250-300 microvolts in the left frontotemporal region with semi-rhythmic activity of 2-4 Hz, mostly observed during wakefulness and drowsiness. No definitive epileptiform discharge was noted. Photic stimulation during the test did not elicit a strong response, and hyperventilation was not conducted during this session.
INTENSE Spine Discomfort, Breathing Difficulties, Muscle Twitches, and Sweating
To elaborate on the situation mentioned in the title, I’ve been experiencing unusual muscle twitches and spasms for the past few days, along with some discomfort in my back. However, today, I felt an unexpected sharp pain shoot through my spine, which has left my legs feeling numb and made it impossible for me to sit up straight. Additionally, I’ve been dealing with cold sweats for the last hour and struggling to breathe properly. Perhaps I’m just overanalyzing things and it’s a common occurrence, but the intensity of the pain is overwhelming—it's truly unbearable. I’m shaking quite a bit, and unfortunately, my parents aren’t responding to my attempts to reach them for help. I have a history of a chronic heart condition and arthritis, yet I’ve never experienced pain this severe, especially in my spine. For context, I am nearly 15 years old and female. My current medications include pain relievers, anxiety medication, beta blockers, and some vitamins, though those specifics may not be particularly relevant. I don’t smoke; however, I have tried vaping a few times, which might not matter much, but I thought it was worth mentioning as it was requested.
Understanding Atrial Fibrillation and Thyroid Issues: Variability in Cardioversion Decisions
Hello everyone, I’m reaching out for guidance regarding my mother’s current health situation, and I’d greatly appreciate any shared experiences or thoughts. **My mother's background:** - **Age**: 55 years - **Weight**: Recently dropped to 116 kg from 118 kg in just two days, likely due to diuretics. - **Health history**: Previously an underactive thyroid, undiagnosed and untreated, now presenting as overactive. - **Medications**: Currently taking thyroid medication and a beta-blocker (Rapiblock). **Current health status:** My mother has been hospitalized since Tuesday, experiencing **atrial fibrillation with heart rates exceeding 200** beats per minute due to her thyroid's hyperactivity. - The plan for cardioversion was initially settled on Tuesday. However, the following day, the medical team advised postponing it until her thyroid levels could be stabilized, believing that her heart rate would return to normal once her thyroid condition was managed. - Her **obesity** precludes her from undergoing a transthoracic echocardiogram, and due to her thyroid concerns, she cannot handle contrast dye (this has been a consistent issue for over four years). Therefore, the only feasible option was a **transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)**, which has yet to be performed. - She has been prescribed various medications including beta-blockers and thyroid treatments in the past. - On Friday, a doctor proposed proceeding with cardioversion; however, the attending senior physician objected. - Today (Saturday), another clinician has expressed a desire to move forward with cardioversion, having initiated a new medication, as the senior physician is unavailable. - **Communication has been unclear**, as we were notified of developments by a nurse rather than the physician in charge, causing confusion and anxiety. - Currently, only a **chest X-ray** is scheduled, and the TEE remains unaddressed. **My inquiries are as follows:** 1. Is it common for medical professionals to have varying opinions and frequently revise medication or treatment plans like cardioversion? 2. Is it safe to conduct cardioversion in the absence of a TEE? I presumed that this was a standard procedure to exclude the presence of blood clots. 3. Is it usual practice to have only a chest X-ray prior to moving ahead with cardioversion? 4. How typical is it for patients or their families to not be directly informed about treatment changes and learn about them through nursing staff instead? I recognize that this cannot substitute for professional medical advice. I’m simply trying to discern whether these circumstances are typical or if we should express our concerns more assertively with the healthcare facility. Thank you for your insights!
28-Year-Old Male Experiencing Scalp Sensations Post-Amitriptyline Treatment
I am a 28-year-old man in generally good health, without any cardiac concerns. Approximately a month ago, I encountered intense pain localized to one side of my head, which was unresponsive to paracetamol. However, a single dose of a migraine treatment provided substantial relief. Following that, I began a regimen of amitriptyline, starting at a nightly dose of 10 to 25 mg. While my head pain has diminished significantly—by about 90 to 95%—I now experience occasional uncomfortable sensations on my scalp. These feelings include pins and needles, a cooling sensation, and some crawling feelings near my hairline and ears. There are fleeting moments where I feel brief throbs lasting a second, but I do not have any persistent headaches. To clarify, I do not experience any of the following: - Nausea - Weakness in my limbs - Numbness - Changes in my vision - Coordination difficulties - Seizures The symptoms I have are transient, shifting around and often intensifying when I become conscious of them or as the day progresses. I would like to know: Is it common to experience these sensations during the recovery stage following episodes of neuralgia or migraine-like discomfort? Additionally, could the amitriptyline potentially be causing these temporary paresthetic sensations? I am seeking some reassurance or advice on what is typically observed during this healing process. Thank you.
7-Month-Old Child with Abernethy Malformation - Exploring Treatment Options
# 7-Month-Old Child with Abernethy Malformation - Exploring Treatment Options ## [7-Month-Old] Identified with Abernethy Malformation (Congenital Portosystemic Shunt) - Treatment Methods? **Age:** 7 months **Gender:** Female **Height:** Age-appropriate **Weight:** Currently 9 kg, was 2.8 kg at birth **Ethnicity:** Asian **Duration of Symptoms:** Present since birth **Location:** Uzbekistan **Pre-existing Health Issues:** Abernethy malformation (congenital portosystemic shunt), liver hemangiomas, chronic jaundice, anemia **Current Treatments:** Supportive management --- ## INITIAL PRESENTATION (June 2025 - July 2025) Our daughter arrived on **June 27, 2025**, presenting with: - Birth weight: **2.8 kg** - Marked jaundice (yellowing of skin and sclera) - Pale or clay-colored stools - **Bilirubin level: 245 μmol/L** (typically <20) An immediate ultrasound indicated multiple liver anomalies, initially thought to be hemangiomas. --- ## FIRST COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT (August 1, 2025 - 1 Month Old) ### Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) with 3-Phase Contrast (August 1, 2025): **RESULTS:** - **Portocaval shunt size: 9.9 mm** (blood bypassing the liver into the inferior vena cava) - **Arteriovenous shunt size: 4.4 mm** - **Portal vein size: 6.1 mm** (patent) - **Three nodular cystic lesions** located in the perivascular area, with largest measuring 11.6×20.7 mm, enhancing during the venous phase - Liver features a heterogeneous architecture, exhibiting irregular enhancement - Gallbladder appears elongated and slightly enlarged - Other abdominal organs exhibit normal findings **RADIOLOGIST’S ASSESSMENT:** "Congenital portosystemic shunt indicative of Abernethy malformation; less likely arteriovenous malformation (AVM); cannot dismiss the possibility of localized liver lesions." **ADVICE:** Seek consultations with an abdominal and vascular surgeon. ### Blood Tests (August 1, 2025): **Complete Blood Count:** - WBC: 10.44 × 10⁹/L (normal range) - **RBC: 2.1 × 10¹²/L** (LOW - indicating severe anemia) - **Hemoglobin: 69 g/L** (CRITICALLY LOW; normal is 117-166) - Platelets: 403 × 10⁹/L (elevated) **Biochemistry Analysis:** - Urea: 1.80 mmol/L (normal) - Creatinine: 33.4 μmol/L (normal) - **ALT: >1000 IU/mL** (EXTREMELY HIGH - severe liver dysfunction) --- ## FOLLOW-UP IMAGING (December 16, 2025 - 5.5 Months Old) ### Liver Ultrasound: **RESULTS:** - Right lobe: 64 mm, left lobe: 43 mm - Liver capsule appears irregular and vague - **Parenchyma: heterogeneous, showing 7 hypo-isoechoic nodules** (sizes range from 11.5×10.7 mm to 17.6×15.4 mm) - Capsule features uneven contours - Blood flow noted during Doppler examination - No dilation in intrahepatic bile ducts - **Portal vein: 3.9 mm** (decreased from 6.1 mm - indicating improvement) - Common bile duct: 1.4 mm - Gallbladder: measures 43.7×9.2 mm (pear-shaped, wall thickness 2.0 mm, homogeneous, free of stones) **ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT:** "Presence of liver volumetric formations (specifically liver hemangiomas)." --- ## LATEST MSCT (February 6, 2026 - 7 Months Old) ### MSCT with 3-Phase Contrast: **FINDINGS:** - Liver remains normal in size, but shows heterogeneous structure with uneven contrast enhancement - **Portocaval shunt: 9.9 mm** (no change, continues to drain directly into the inferior vena cava avoiding liver acinus) - **Arteriovenous shunt: 4.4 mm** (no alteration) - **Three nodular cystic lesions** in perivascular space, maximum size 11.6×20.7 mm, enhancing in the venous phase - **Portal vein: 6.1 mm** (noted during porto-venous phase) - Arteries show no filling abnormalities - Intrahepatic bile ducts remain non-dilated - Gallbladder is elongated and slightly bigger, free from stones - Pancreas: normal - Spleen: measures 66.9×38.5 mm (not enlarged), splenic vein is 3.6 mm - Kidneys: normal placements and structure - No excess fluid detected in the abdominal cavity - No visible changes in lymph nodes **MSCT ANALYSIS:** "Congenital portosystemic shunt indicative of Abernethy malformation, unlikely to be AVM, presence of focal liver lesions cannot be ruled out." **RECOMMENDATION:** Engage with an abdominal and vascular surgeon. --- ## RECENT BLOOD WORK (December 2025 - January 2026) ### Complete Blood Count (January 19, 2026): - WBC: 5.8 × 10⁹/L (SHOWS IMPROVEMENT) - **RBC: 2.93 × 10¹²/L** (IMPROVED but still low) - **Hemoglobin: 72 g/L** (SHOWS IMPROVEMENT but still low) - Platelets: 223 × 10⁹/L (BACK TO NORMAL) - Neutrophils: 30.0% - Lymphocytes: 64.8% - Monocytes: 4.6% ### Biochemistry (January 28, 2026): - Total protein level: 67 g/L (slightly deficient) - Creatinine: 20.7 μmol/L - **Total Bilirubin: 242 μmol/L** (STILL HIGH - unchanged) - **Direct Bilirubin: 142 μmol/L** (VERY HIGH) - **ALT: 50 IU/mL** (DRASTICALLY LOWER from >1000!) --- ## OVERVIEW OF PROGRESS OVER 6 MONTHS | Parameter | August 2025 | January 2026 | Change | |------------------|-------------|---------------|--------------------------| | **Hemoglobin** | 69 g/L | 72 g/L | ↗ Slight improvement | | **RBC** | 2.1 | 2.93 | ↗ Improved | | **ALT** | >1000 | 50 | ✓✓ MAJOR IMPROVEMENT | | **Bilirubin** | 245 | 242 | → Unchanged (still elevated) | | **Portal vein** | 6.1 mm | 3.9 mm (US) | ↗ Decreased | | **Platelets** | 403 | 223 | ↘ Normalized | | **Shunt size** | 9.9 mm | 9.9 mm | → No Change | --- ## CURRENT SITUATION (February 2026 - 7 Months Old) - **Weight:** 9 kg (good growth rate in spite of condition) - **Jaundice:** Continues to be present (yellow skin) - **Stools:** Remain pale/clay-colored - **Development:** Achieving appropriate milestones - **Energy:** Appears to have a good energy level - **Feeding:** Normal appetite --- ## QUESTIONS FOR r/AskDocs We have been informed this is **Type 2 Abernethy malformation** (portal vein present). **Three treatment avenues have been proposed:** ### Option 1: **Endovascular Coil Embolization** (minimally invasive approach) - A catheter is inserted via the leg vein to access the shunt and deploy coils/plugs to close the abnormal vessels - Pros: No surgical incision, minimal discomfort, short hospital stay (2-4 days), no scars, enhanced safety - Duration: 1-2 hours - Recovery: 2-4 weeks for jaundice to show improvement ### Option 2: **Open Surgical Intervention** - An incision in the abdomen to ligate abnormal vessels and redirect blood to the liver - Pros: Direct visualization, effective results - Cons: Surgical scar, longer recovery time (7-14 days in hospital) - Duration: 2-4 hours ### Option 3: **Liver Transplantation** - We have been advised this is not necessary as the portal vein is functional and liver health is improving. --- ## SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER: 1. **With a functional portal vein (6.1 mm) and improving liver function (ALT normalized), is it advisable to pursue endovascular closure as the preferred treatment?** 2. **Despite ALT levels improving, the bilirubin remains consistently high (242). Should this be a cause for concern? Is there a prospect for it to normalize post shunt closure?** 3. **Are the hemangiomas/nodules (11.6×20.7 mm) linked to the shunt? Will they likely resolve following shunt repair?** 4. **How urgent is the proposed intervention? Is immediate action required, or is there flexibility to wait a few months?** 5. **What complications should we be vigilant for during the waiting period?** 6. **Regarding endovascular closure - what is the average success rate for infants aged 7 months? Are there concerns regarding the shunt size (9.9 mm)?** 7. **The measurement of the portal vein has shown improvement from 6.1 mm to 3.9 mm; should this be perceived as a positive sign or a reason for concern?** 8. **Are there special directives (diet modifications, medications) we should consider while awaiting the procedure?** 9. **Post-procedure, how long should we expect it might take for:** - Normalization of bilirubin levels? - Return of stool color to normal? - Resolution of jaundice? - Regression of hemangiomas? 10. **Can you recommend any specialized centers for pediatric Abernethy malformation treatments? We are located in Uzbekistan but are prepared to travel (to Turkey, Russia, South Korea, etc.)** --- ## ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - No family history of hepatic diseases - Pregnancy and delivery were normal - No additional congenital defects identified - Immunizations up to date - No history of bleeding disorders - No signs indicative of encephalopathy - Child is alert and engaged --- **I can supply actual MSCT images and comprehensive lab reports if they would be of assistance.** We sincerely appreciate any insights you can provide. We are striving to make the most informed decision regarding our daughter’s care and highly value expert medical opinions. **TL;DR:** 7-month-old diagnosed with Abernethy Type 2 malformation (9.9 mm portocaval shunt, patent portal vein). Liver functionality is improving (normalized ALT) while bilirubin remains elevated (242). Evaluating options between endovascular coil embolization and open surgery. Seeking expert advice on optimal treatment strategy and timing.